A Brokeback Mountain Sanitation Query


                             200px-Brokeback_mountain

So I was wondering the other day…

When you’re a gay cowboy out on the dry, dusty plains with your significant other who is also a gay cowboy…

And you’re filled with passion for each other and engage in the ultimate, most intimate, unprotected act of homosexual male erotic love…

And after the exubrance and heat of the climactic moment have passed and start to fade…

After all is said and done…

How do you clean the s*** off your d*** when you’re miles away from water?

The alternative – riding around all day with smelly crap in your private bits – is kinda out there, even for tough and manly cowboys. Especially if you happen to be a gay cowboy back in the old Wild West, before wet-wipes (both front or back use) and sanitized latex condoms were invented.

Just was wondering.


8 Responses to “A Brokeback Mountain Sanitation Query”

  1. texas Says:

    This post makes me wonder if you’ve ever had sex with anything at all.

    If you had, you’d know that you don’t need FRIGGIN LAKE MICHIGAN to clean your d***.

    About a cup of water will do just fine.

    Which in turn makes me wonder if you know anything about anything.

    Because of course there’s water in those quantities everywhere there are people. Including remote mountains. Because people (and sheep) have to drink. And because those of them who actually have sex, have to wash their d***s.

    I do think your interest in the logistics is pretty remarkable though. If you could do a study on only the people who watched (or more likely, didn’t watch) the movie, and had that particular thought, I’m sure you would find yourself with a really interesting group of minds on your hands. I mean that in utter seriousness. I’d LOVE to do a study on the sample of people who remained after that screening process.

    Of course, you’d still be in a class of your own, since you not only had the thought, but wrote a strikingly lush bit of prose about it, and posted it in your blog.

    But since you’re special that way, you get a special sneak preview of my study! I’ve already told you one of my questions!

    It’s at the top of this comment.

  2. Scott Thong Says:

    I’ll conclude your study for you – I’m a 25 year old virgin.

    This is because of the fact that I’m not married yet and few little somethings called ‘chastity’, ‘self control’, ‘abstinence’, ‘holiness’ and ‘honour’ – words which doubtless makes no sense to you.

    Washing mucuosal secretions off is one thing… But one Dixie cup of water to get rid of the three inches of shit that smells like… Well, shit?

    I’d like to do a study on how many everyday people would still be vocally supportive of homosexuality if LGBT groups were required to actually state what it is they support instead of using fuzzy, innocuous, whitewash terms like ‘love’ and ‘alternative lifestyle’:

    “Rainbow Coalition of San Francisco supports a man’s right to put his penis into another man’s anus!”

  3. Marcus C Says:

    So…”love” is a fuzzy, innocuous, whitewash term?

    What planet did you just land from?

    Not all male gays participate in anal sex, by the way.

    Your post belies an obsessive fascination with this subject.

    As a 25-year-old virgin, I’m sure you’re also familiar with the term “closet case.”

    I’ll include you in my prayers.

  4. Scott Thong Says:

    Update: I’m now a 26-year-old heterosexually married man.

    If you judge levels of obsession with the number of posts, amount of content or regularity of coverage, homosexuality

    A question: Why do pro-homosexuality commentors almost always take the low road of insinuations that I am a closet homosexual, instead of taking the trouble to present valid and logical arguments to support their position?

    Is it because they have little in the way of well thought-out points to make? Or are they simply too lazy, thus resorting to drive-by smears?

    Even if I were a raging homo, none of my points would be any less valid. And you’d still have no points to make.

  5. Nature and Religion Won’t Suffice As Good Defenses. « The Racing Mind Says:

    [...] see A Brokeback Mountain Sanitation Query for a related question on hygiene and cleanliness (which is next to godliness, of [...]

  6. FYI Says:

    You usually dont get anything on your dk at all. Its not like there is shit there constantly.

  7. Scott Thong Says:

    Um, I don’t think I have to add anything to that comment…

  8. rj Says:

    Fags Fags Fags…………are discusting lesbians the same!
    A ticket to damnation wow!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 83 other followers

%d bloggers like this: