Okay, how many people place money on the fact that this blogger Alexander the Great (alexandersarchive.wordpress.com) is actually the commentor theism, who also created a new blog called theism just to cover his sock-puppetry tracks?
Note that the first link above leads to a blog post that focuses on the exact two of my posts that commentor theism trolls at (this post on incest and this post on Palestinians).
What are the odds of that? Not only that, somehow Alexander manages to title his post ‘Stealing For God’ which would require linking two disparate and unconnected posts (one about matters of religion, and one about Middle East politics that doesn’t even mention God)… Just as theism did in the comments.
And how did he know about theism’s blog, when theism never even left his blog address on the comments he made at my posts?
Not to mention that the new blog ‘theism’ has only one recent, incoherent posting at the time of this comment, which makes it incredibly unlikely that Alexander the Great came across it through Google search:
So at the very least, the two of them are closely affiliated.
At the worst, they are one and the same person - which means that Alexander the Not-so-great has engaged in immoral sock puppetry by using multiple aliases while pretending (and even intentionally greatly attempting to convince others) that they are not all him.
But look closer at the only person in the YOONIVARSE who notices that such a new and content-less blog as theism’s even exists, on the very day that its existence came into being:
They’re practically married and under the sheets in the hotel room! Ewwwww!
Therefore, after reviewing the circumstantial evidence as summarized below:
- Alexander posts on the same two topics theism was prodding me about (and not any other of my plentiful insulting/antagonistic posts),
- Alexander cites a ‘new blog’ by theism that has only one odd post and no other content,
- The new post at theism is posted only one day before Alexander’s post bashing me,
- The new post does not even mention my two posts that commentor theism made his remarks on, yet Alexander can manage to pick up just those two of my posts,
- Alexander managed to find said theism blog despite its being newborn and having no content (even though I couldn’t because theism never posted his blog address in his comments on my blog), and
- Alexander is the only commentor on theism’s single post, on the very day theism creates that post,
I conjecture that Alexander intentionally created the theism blog in order to ‘legitimately’ attack me in his blog on the exact same items that commentor theism has been attacking me on.
Oh my, am I stealing Alexander/theim’s copyright on blog contents now? Well, Fair Use Doctrine specifically states that
[A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism.
And I am SO using screenshots of his/her/its/their blog(s) in order to criticize them.
————————————
MORE EVIDENCE!! UPDATE 28 APRIL 2008: By comparing the times on the comments, an amazing factoid is uncovered.
Observe the timestamps on the Alexander’s and my comments at alexandersarchive:
I left that comment there this morning, which to me is the 28th of April 2008. I also left the following comment on my own blog at around the same time I commented at Alexander’s:
By comparing the timestamps (8.16 am on Monday versus 4.33pm on Sunday), you can deduce that my blog’s timestamps are 16 hours ahead of Alexander’s (28 Apr 0813 hours minus 27 Apr 1633 hours).
Now look at the time when commentor theism remarked on my blog recently:
27 Apr 1410 hours on my blog, which minusing the 16 hour difference, would be about 26 Apr 2210 hours (that is, 10 pm) on Alexander’s blog.
So let’s look at those comments on Alexander’s blog again:
Oh, what a coincidence! Alexander and commentor theism just happen to come online and respond to my comments on the respective blogs at almost exactly the same time!
Not only that, Alexander comments to me: FAIL, Scott, fail. Which just happens to be what I had said to commentor theism (not Alexander!) at here and here.
Amazing coincidence. If I were religious, I’d claim it as a miracle of God. A GOD MIRAKUL!!!!1one!
Okay, sacrcastic snarkiness aside…
MARRIED, OR THE SAME PERSON?
Tags: Alexander the Great, http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com, http://theism.wordpress.com, hypocrisy, sock puppet, sock puppetry, theism
April 26, 08 at 9:20 pm
If theism and alexander are one the same person, that makes him The Thief, stealing space on your blog. That would make him The Hypocrite, too. Well, some people can’t bear to lose any argument, and theism is clearly such a person. A poor loser. Not able to face any more of the truth (that he has lost), he snakes his way around. A theist? Can’t be. A snake, offspring of The Snake? Or are theism and alexander really a 2-in-1, digital siamese twins, joined at the head, with no space for grey matter?
April 27, 08 at 8:41 am
I can guess at who he is. Someone who has called you a neocom recently. This kinda smacks of his antics. Yes the same guy who while claiming to be an atheist prays to Baal.
April 27, 08 at 8:55 am
Adventures of an atheist:
Remember when we were kids and we sneaked unauthorised into the quarry for a dip in their pool. Yeah, trust you to drag me into your illegal forays in the village (as dad warned me), and of course you had to bring along two ah moi’s.
[ ]
I knew you manipulated the two lassies into that situation, angling to get them to strip. I have to admit I was highly embarrassed,..
[ ]
April 27, 08 at 9:27 am
Had a rethink; not The Thief, but because he is being petty about the photograph, a petty thief. Methinks he also made things up when he says he has two online friends who are photographers. An un-inventive small mind.
April 29, 08 at 9:59 am
AP/Reuters and their photographer are a band of incorrigible lying thieves:
AP’s Ibrahim Barzak is now reporting Israel’s side of the story, but very skeptically:
“In a statement, the military said explosives carried by the militants were detonated by an Israeli airstrike, and the blast from the explosives hit the house, not a tank shell, “and uninvolved civilians were hit.” Palestinians said the militants were at least 400 yards from the house and none of the fighters were killed near the structure.”
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jD4YSkDPlclqd9dHvg2f0Ij18zEgD90B127O0
But the most detailed Gaza based account of the events, from PCHR which blames Israel for the explosion, show that this last sentence is a lie:
“The rocket fell 10 meters away from the house of Ahmad Eid Hassan Abu Me’tiq, seriously injuring a resistance member. Less than a minute later two rockets were fired at the same area and landed at the door of the same house, killing another resistance member: Ibrahim Salem Suliman Hajouj (20). Shrapnel from the rockets destroyed the house door and spread inside the house. ”
http://pchrgaza.org/files/PressR/English/2008/40-2008.html
The AP cannot do basic fact-checks to show that their Palestinian Arab sources are, simply, liars, and by quoting them credulously they make it appear that the evidence supports the Palestinian Arab story and not the Israeli version. They are doing a better job than the thousand-odd “news” stories that don’t even acknowledge Israel’s claims, but they still fail basic journalism principles.