Okay, how many people place money on the fact that this blogger Alexander the Great (alexandersarchive.wordpress.com) is actually the commentor theism, who also created a new blog called theism just to cover his sock-puppetry tracks?
What are the odds of that? Not only that, somehow Alexander manages to title his post ‘Stealing For God’ which would require linking two disparate and unconnected posts (one about matters of religion, and one about Middle East politics that doesn’t even mention God)… Just as theism did in the comments.
And how did he know about theism’s blog, when theism never even left his blog address on the comments he made at my posts?
Not to mention that the new blog ‘theism’ has only one recent, incoherent posting at the time of this comment, which makes it incredibly unlikely that Alexander the Great came across it through Google search:
So at the very least, the two of them are closely affiliated.
At the worst, they are one and the same person - which means that Alexander the Not-so-great has engaged in immoral sock puppetry by using multiple aliases while pretending (and even intentionally greatly attempting to convince others) that they are not all him.
But look closer at the only person in the YOONIVARSE who notices that such a new and content-less blog as theism’s even exists, on the very day that its existence came into being:
They’re practically married and under the sheets in the hotel room! Ewwwww!
Therefore, after reviewing the circumstantial evidence as summarized below:
- Alexander posts on the same two topics theism was prodding me about (and not any other of my plentiful insulting/antagonistic posts),
- Alexander cites a ‘new blog’ by theism that has only one odd post and no other content,
- The new post at theism is posted only one day before Alexander’s post bashing me,
- The new post does not even mention my two posts that commentor theism made his remarks on, yet Alexander can manage to pick up just those two of my posts,
- Alexander managed to find said theism blog despite its being newborn and having no content (even though I couldn’t because theism never posted his blog address in his comments on my blog), and
- Alexander is the only commentor on theism’s single post, on the very day theism creates that post,
I conjecture that Alexander intentionally created the theism blog in order to ‘legitimately’ attack me in his blog on the exact same items that commentor theism has been attacking me on.
Oh my, am I stealing Alexander/theim’s copyright on blog contents now? Well, Fair Use Doctrine specifically states that
[A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism.
And I am SO using screenshots of his/her/its/their blog(s) in order to criticize them.
MORE EVIDENCE!! UPDATE 28 APRIL 2008: By comparing the times on the comments, an amazing factoid is uncovered.
Observe the timestamps on the Alexander’s and my comments at alexandersarchive:
I left that comment there this morning, which to me is the 28th of April 2008. I also left the following comment on my own blog at around the same time I commented at Alexander’s:
By comparing the timestamps (8.16 am on Monday versus 4.33pm on Sunday), you can deduce that my blog’s timestamps are 16 hours ahead of Alexander’s (28 Apr 0813 hours minus 27 Apr 1633 hours).
Now look at the time when commentor theism remarked on my blog recently:
27 Apr 1410 hours on my blog, which minusing the 16 hour difference, would be about 26 Apr 2210 hours (that is, 10 pm) on Alexander’s blog.
So let’s look at those comments on Alexander’s blog again:
Oh, what a coincidence! Alexander and commentor theism just happen to come online and respond to my comments on the respective blogs at almost exactly the same time!
Amazing coincidence. If I were religious, I’d claim it as a miracle of God. A GOD MIRAKUL!!!!1one!
Okay, sacrcastic snarkiness aside…
MARRIED, OR THE SAME PERSON?