Liberal Definition of A ‘Person’


Moonbattery put it so well in this post on liberal insani-reality, that I had to repost it.

The following is the liberal  / humanist  / atheist / moral relativist  understanding of what a PERSON is:

A person:

       NonHumanChimpanzee

The above should have the right to freedom from captivity, freedom from pain, pursuit of happiness, and welfare financial support.

Not a person:

       20WeekOldHumanFetus

The above does not even have the right to live.

Partial birth abortion (or, How to Smash and Cut Open a Baby’s Skull)

Hey, Do You Think We Should We Kill Babies?

You Reach Your Right Hand In, And Pull The Baby’s Brains Out

Are Your Babies Inside Your Parents?

Back to the Future Stem Cells

Liberal Vampires Would Kill Millions of Stem Cell Babies to Live Longer

Mommy Why Don’t You Love Me


Tags: , ,

22 Responses to “Liberal Definition of A ‘Person’”

  1. Nate Says:

    That’s ridiculous, Pan troglodytes are not Homo sapiens.

    Fetuses are of course people, as are zygotes, as are haploids. Your mind has been warped by the media bias. You are self-censoring. trillions of human lives, in the form of haploids die every single day, yet you ignore this fact.

    You care only about the second trimester fetus. Anyone can care about that, it’s easy to do, but if you want real integrity, if you really stand for the sanctity of human life, you would grow a spine and make the destruction of human haploid cells a criminal offense.

  2. Scott Thong Says:

    Nate, you’re talking to the liberals right? Because they’re the ones who value animal life over human life (not me). I’m just outragedly mocking their insanity.

    Not quite trillions die every day, but one million babies are aborted every month in the world. In just nine years, more humans are killed than in 100 years of Communist purges and genocide.

    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/wrjp338sd.html

    Abortion is murder. If anyone wants to argue about it, let’s see how they’d like to have been aborted.

  3. The Big List of Terms For Moonbats « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT Says:

    […] Self-loather Species traitor Socialist Stalinite Surrendercrat Surrender […]

  4. a mother Says:

    So you think you who was once a fetus have the God-given right to live? You don’t, if you think an innocent baby doesn’t. You are sick, selfish, confused, and inhumane for even posting that stupid page. Your mother could have aborted you, but she didn’t, unfortunatley for all those who read your idiotic page. Humans are make the world run. You really want to be run by an animal that can’t even talk or comprehend. If your so adament about killing a fetus and saving a gorrilla, then why don’t you go kill yourself and MAKE ROOM FOR THE GORRILLLAS!! Oh wait, do you cherish your life? well so doesn’t every other human! Wake up! you are very ignorant and brainwashed! you don’t even know what your talking about. don’t like what i’m saying? well don’t worry, maybe your Gorrilla friends will send you some replies supporting you. That is, if they can type or even spell, or talk, or even know who you are or that you exist! Get your head on straight and saying stupid things. If you like kissing and cuddling Gorrilla babies instead of human babies then go ahead. You must like having sex with hairy female gorrilla @$$! I’ll just enjoy my human spouse, and my human baby that’s arriving soon, cause i think they’re cute and deserve to live like i deserved to live. You obviously don’t even know the joy of holding a new born bay in your arms. Maybe you should try holding one of your kind and see if you want to kill it.

  5. Scott Thong Says:

    a mother, I do hope you’re scolding Liberals and not me.

    Because I have the same viewpoint as you, that people who value animals over unborn human life are totally insane and depraved.

    My post is just to point of the unhinged idiocy that Liberal animal ‘rights’ activists practise. It is definitely NOT my own view.

  6. Obama As A Monkey Is Racism, So Shut the F*ck Up Bush Chimp and Condi House N*gga « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT Says:

    […] would be even more RACIST to compare Obama to a human fetus… Since A) Some Liberals consider chimps to have human rights while human fetuses do not, and B) Obama hates human fetuses, as far as his abortion views […]

  7. Caro Says:

    Love this! 100% thumbs up too you, write more!

  8. Scott Thong Says:

    That’s ridiculous, Pan troglodytes are not Homo sapiens.

    Fetuses are of course people, as are zygotes, as are haploids. Your mind has been warped by the media bias. You are self-censoring. trillions of human lives, in the form of haploids die every single day, yet you ignore this fact.

    You care only about the second trimester fetus. Anyone can care about that, it’s easy to do, but if you want real integrity, if you really stand for the sanctity of human life, you would grow a spine and make the destruction of human haploid cells a criminal offense.

    – Nate

    Actually, the above assumption is the ridiculous one.

    When sperm are left in a human womb, after a few days they die.

    Even when sperm are left in the human testicles that produced them, after a certain period they are broken down and reabsorbed.

    When unfertilized ova are left in a human womb, after a period of time they are no longer viable.

    Clearly, haploid cells are not sustainable ‘life’ if left to natural progression.

    Whereas if a fertilized ovum (diploid cell) is left in a human womb, over time it will NOT die but rather grow into a full human being if left to progress naturally.

    Ergo, the blockquoted argument is clearly flawed.

    Thanks to the libs at the forum for bringing my attention back to this!

  9. Nature and Religion Won’t Suffice As Good Defenses. « The Racing Mind Says:

    […] beasts controlled solely by base and bestial impulses. (Well, people and not animals as far as liberal definitions are NOT involved, nor moral relativist […]

  10. pikifOu Says:

    Obviously yes, the prime one has a primary consciousness. That’s what his brain and experience allow him to have. A monky can “talk” (with a symbolic keyboard) with a few hundred words.
    That’s more than a retard.
    So, if you think that trisomic child shouldn’t be aborted, monkeys should be saved.

  11. Scott Thong Says:

    Well, it’s pretty clear cut to me – a retarded human child is a human, a sentient talking adult above-genius-level gorilla with mind-control powers is still an animal.

    The human child lives. The talking gorilla gets beaten up by the Justice League.

    Yes, I’m an unapologetic specieist. Sue me, but get a nonhuman laywer to file suit please.

  12. pikifOu Says:

    Review your primary school lessons. Humans are animal, so a retarded human child is an animal, as the sentient talking adult above-genius-level gorilla with mind-control powers.

    So you admit your whole argument as being purely rhetorical, thus pointless and absurd.

    As your thoughts are not based on sense but on a show of sophism, I guess arguing is pointless and absurd.

  13. Scott Thong Says:

    Sorry pikif0u, as I reside in a non-liberal-degraded society, my primary school textbooks always made sure to emphasize the difference between humans and animals, despite the similar physiological makeup.

    But hey – if humans = animals, let’s all have hot doggie sex!

    https://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/fascism-and-bestiality-atheists-please-tell-me-why-i-am-morally-wrong/

  14. Matt D Says:

    P*N*S is beautiful!

  15. XXFRAGMENXX Says:

    U STUPID P*SSIES THEY DO DESERVE TO DIE GROW THE F*CK UP!!!!!!!!!!!!

  16. Skulander Says:

    The sad thing is, a fertilized egg should be considered fully a person.

    Meanwhile, the woman carring the said egg should NOT be considered a person. Her needs, her wishes, her well-being do not matter at all, according to right-wing wingnuts. She should simply STFU and bear as many babies as possible.

    These attacks on women’s reproductive rights must stop. Women hae control over their bodies. They DO decide what happens to their pregnancy. And if they don’t want to become a mother, it’s their own choice. 90% of abortions occur during the 1st trimester. So early in the pregnancy, NO ONE has the moral authority to make decisions for a woman. NO one.

  17. Scott Thong Says:

    Meanwhile, the woman carring the said egg should NOT be considered a person. Her needs, her wishes, her well-being do not matter at all, according to right-wing wingnuts. She should simply STFU and bear as many babies as possible.

    Hey, is it us wingnuts who go around blathering about how great it is to have free sex with any number of guys who don’t plan on marrying you, and can’t be bothered to use a condom?

    Speaking of well being, the actual wingnut position is that abortion should be ALLOWED… In extreme cases such as rape, incest or threat to the health and life of the mother.

    Whereas the liberal position since Roe v. Wade is F*CK, GET PREGNANT, KILL BABY BECAUSE YOUR ‘EMOTIONAL HEALTH’ IS THREATENED, REPEAT.

    These attacks on women’s reproductive rights must stop. Women hae control over their bodies.

    Like I said above: They have control, so WHY CAN’T THEY USE THAT DAMN CONTRACEPTION if they don’t want all the issues involved with abortion? It’s not like rubbers aren’t easilt available, in fact it’s libs who get condoms handed out free in elementary schools.

    Seriously, which is less of a hassle: Popping a pill or sliding on a rubber, or having your uterus invaded by toxic chemicals or sharp implements?

  18. Molly Marie Says:

    “You care only about the second trimester fetus. Anyone can care about that, it’s easy to do, but if you want real integrity, if you really stand for the sanctity of human life, you would grow a spine and make the destruction of human haploid cells a criminal offense.”

    To add to what Scott said earlier, this claim is ridiculous on a biological level. Gametic cells – that is, sperm and egg cells – are haploid cells. They contain 23 chromosomes each, half of YOUR DNA. Therefore, since it is YOUR DNA you can do whatever you want with it (having a menstrual cycle if you’re female or bluntly, jacking off if you’re a dude). But when an egg and sperm come together, the DNA of both haploid cells combine to form a diploid cell that now has 46 chromosomes, the same number as you will find in any living adult’s DNA; and what’s more, it is a COMPLETELY NEW and INDEPENDENT set of DNA – no longer YOUR DNA. This also happens to disprove the pro-choice argument “My body, my choice”. If it’s not your DNA, it isn’t your body.

    Of course, I’m only a high school student in AP Biology, but the above requires only a basic understanding of the subject.

  19. Molly Marie Says:

    Correction: some adults have more or less than 46 (Turner’s syndrome, down syndrome, etc) but you get the point.

  20. jane doe Says:

    What about in cases of incess or rape…i guess the conservative view is that was god will? My personal belief is gods as real as santa claus. i won’t disrespect your opinions bc it does no good, why can’t u just let others live there life as they would. and i encourage u to hold tight to your belief and live YOUR life as u woul. telling ppl to kill themselves is not the way to vbed

  21. jane doe Says:

    What about in cases of incess or rape…i guess the conservative view is that was god will? My personal belief is gods as real as santa claus. But that is my opinion freind, and i shall not change it. still i WILL NOT disrespect your opinions bc it does no good, why can’t u just let others live there life as they would, as i encourage u to hold tight to your belief and live YOUR life as u woul. telling ppl to kill themselves is not the way to get othefs on your side freind.

  22. Scott Thong Says:

    I understand your position, and as a realist I have to concur that cases of incest or rape must be given special consideration.

    However, citing these special cases distracts from the reality that over 100,000 babies are aborted every month in the USA alone… Over 125,000 every day worldwide! How many of these are aborting pregnancies caused by rape? (Answer: Less than 1%)

    Also, there is a difference between God’s specific will (i.e. what He wants, which is always for our very best) and God’s permissive will (i.e. allowing things to happen even if they are bad). But God did promise that in the end, anything that happens – whether good or bad – is for the final good, even if we can’t see it or imagine how it possibly could be so.

    And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. – Romans 8:28

    Thanks for your politeness by the way. It is becoming all too rare these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: