Global Warming Hysteria: Why Atheists, Christians and Malaysiakini Readers Shouldn’t Believe It

To the Atheists (or Agnostics):

You often say that you cannot believe that God exists, since no conclusive evidence that positively proves God’s existence can be found.

Well, similarly, there is still no conclusive evidence that proves global warming is caused by carbon dioxide emissions. There is only a theory and plenty of conjecture, but it has yet to be shown definitively that global temperature rise is caused mainly by carbon dioxide – and not solar fluctuations, water vapour or cosmic rays.

Yet the proponents of CO2-forced temperature theory have already discarded and branded as ‘heretical’ all other theories in the firm belief that their CO2 models are correct.

By believing that global warming is an imminent doomsday, End Times, apocalyptic, armageddonic End of the World… Are they not religiously putting their trust in prophecies based solely on faith, not reason or logic or cold hard evidence?

For your reading:

Aliens Cause Global Warming

Temple of the Goracle (with Al Gore as its high priest, giving out emissions-and-brimstone sermons and carbon offset indulgences)

Ann Coulter Junks Global Warming Too (how global warming has all the vices of dogmatic, totalitarian religion

Ann Coulter Junks Al Gore Too

100 Scientists Dissent Global Warming

Many Peer Reviewed Scientific Studies Defy Global Warming ‘Consensus’

MAYBE Humans Cause Global Warming That COULD Cause Climate Changes That MIGHT Be Bad, PERHAPS


To the Christians:

It is claimed that global warming is a proven fact, that all evidence points to it, that the vast majority of reputable scientists believe it, and that anyone who does not accept the truth of global warming is a religiously motivated pseudo-juunkscience moron who believes the Earth is flat and the centre of the universe, with the Sun revolving around it.

That is exactly what has been claimed about evolution for the past century.

Does that throw any perspective onto the so-claimed scientific consensus on global warming? Just because the secularists who control the sciences, education system and media say it is true, does not make it the truth.

For your reading:

Why I Feel About Global Warming The Same Way I Feel About Evolution

Compare 100 Scientists Dissent Darwinism with 100 Scientists Dissent Global Warming






This next one is from The New York Times of all places.










The Goracle from Moonbattery:


Plenty more mockery at Global Warming Editorial Cartoons.


To the Malaysiakini Readers:

Open up a newspaper or turn on the TV, and you will find only bad news about global warming. How climate change is jeapordizing our civilization. How more and more evidence points to human-produced carbon dioxide as the threat that will doom us all. How the United Nations and every sane scientist supports drastic measures to curb CO2 emissions.

But before you swallow the brainwash powder they are peddling, consider this: 

The mainstream media is controlled by interests with a stake in perpetuating mass paranoia about ‘global warming’. They go to great lengths to discredit critics of the status quo on ‘global warming’, especially independent media. If they could, they would arrest and silence their critics for the crimes of heresy and public disorder against the establishment, which is firmly backed by the silent majority on ‘global warming’.

Now read the above paragraph again, only replace ‘global warming’ with ‘social contract’, political stability’ or ‘peaceful, tensionless race relations’.

I’ll put it to you bluntly: If you don’t believe anything the mainstream, Government Enslaved Media media has to say about politics, crime, social issues, religious issues, peaceful/violent demonstrations, corruption, fairness and justice…

Then why should you believe what it has to indoctrinate you about global warming either? Isn’t an honest pursuit of the truth why you go to non-government moderated sources such as and blogs?

For your reading:

The IPCC Does Not Want Balanced Climate Reporting

Official British Court Finds 11 Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, Labels It As Political Propaganda

Classical Values on The IPCC Mandate

NST: Global Warming: The Facts Do Not Add Upa> (last paragraph of letter, which is repeated in the quotes below)

Also read the following quotes:

“We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we may have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.” – Stephen Schneider, one of the original leading proponents of global warming

Balanced reporting perpetuates the public’s perception that scientists are in disarray, which is misleading in the case of climate change.” – Kevin Hennessy, lead scientist with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

“I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it (global warming) is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” – Al Gore, probably the most well known public proponent of global warming


For everyone’s reading on carbon dioxide and global warming:

Video: Refuting Al Gore on CO2 Levels and Temperature

Carbon Emissions and Percentage of Atmosphere

Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming – 5 Reasons Why I’m Not Alarmed

35 Scientific Errors (or Intentional Lies) in An Inconvenient Truth

Official British Court Finds 11 Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, Labels It As Political Propaganda

Many Peer Reviewed Scientific Studies Defy Global Warming ‘Consensus’

Ground Based Temperature Recording Stations: Stupid Locations For Measuring Global Warming

A Skeptical Layman’s Guide to Anthropogenic Global Warming

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

11 Responses to “Global Warming Hysteria: Why Atheists, Christians and Malaysiakini Readers Shouldn’t Believe It”

  1. brocolli Says:

    yea yea yea no one ‘knows’ the truth really, and science cannot pass it’s own philosophy, but at the end of the day, I’d rather work towards reducing reliance on fossil fuels or pollutants and go for more sustainable ways of managing wastes, even if it all doesn’t mean doomsday, I’d still want a healthier environment. all these so called debunking of global warming doomsday shit sounds like holier-than thou scientist who has nothing much to offer society apart from empty intellectual excercises. sure al gore is a hypocrite.. so are all of us in the strictest sense. debunk doomsday myth if we may, but don’t forget the real environmental issues that came with it.

  2. Jamie Says:

    So go ahead and reduce your reliance on fossil fuels and pollutants. Just don’t try to force your reductions onto the developing world that haven’t had the luxury of becoming rich enough to afford reducing CO2 emissions.

  3. Scott Thong Says:

    Brocolli, it’s all good and happy to reduce energy use, pollution and fossil fuel use (especially if it kicks the Terror Oil States in the nuts!).

    But frankly, the methods promoted by Al Gore, the IPCC and the ongoing Bali talks are NOT a smart idea. We simply don’t have the infrastructure and technology to reduce our carbon output so quickly, without suffering massive losses.

    To wit: Kyoto is costing billions and yet will only reduce the temperature by just 0.001 degree Celcius for every 150 billion spent. So worthless!

    We would be much better off developing ‘green, clean’ energy infrastructure first. It may take a decade or so, but once wind/solar/nuclear energy is sufficient, businesses will naturally switch to them as oil and coal rise in price.

    For example, the Bussard Fusion reactor would cost just a few hundred million to prove and build… And it’d use plentiful fuel to provide almost limitless, emissionless energy with no radiation! Perfect!

    Unfortunately, the Bali talks are being hijacked by socialists who intend to tax EVERYONE who earns USD750 a month or more. 750 a month! That’s almost everyone, taxed merely for earming a living! And of course, rich blabbermouths like Gore can easily afford it.

    Not to mention fining parents for having children. Absurd!

    Meanwhile, Al Gore stands to earn tons of cash for passing pollution around the table, without actually reducing any of it.

    So you see, even if the global warming paranoia IS REAL, Kyoto Protocol and Bali and Al Gore have the WRONG course of action to take.

    By forcing the world to slash CO2 emissions when it’s not ready, carbon caps will only hamper future effective efforts by hamstringing the economy. Without cash, how will we pay for new energy technology and build new clean power stations?

    It’s like throwing a kid into the deep end of the pool before teaching him to even hold his breath, let alone swim.

    Bottom line: Global warming distracts from the REAL environmental causes. The skeptics are doing you all a favour by debunking them. Environmentalist ought to be joining in; some already are.

  4. wits0 Says:

    Scott: “Brocolli, it’s all good and happy to reduce energy use, pollution and fossil fuel use (especially if it kicks the Terror Oil States in the nuts!).”

    You betcha, wrt to being sorta held to ransome by ’em.

    You will also remember that in recent years, new cars that were sold in M’sia use those environmental friendly air conditioner gas that went for 4 – 5 times the price of the previous one. What kind of imposed fleecing is this for consumers ? And way before this has become really mandatory. Another added imposition on car owners (not as if everyone who owns a car is well-off or the income is that high) in M’sia where the prices for cars are about double that elsewhere everywhere in the region because of government protectionism. So, if your air-cond system leaks(they always do with use, unlike the case with a household refrigerator), every motorist faces extra recurrent costs. Very quietedly done, this.

  5. jedyoong Says:

    ha ha ha ha hahah aha hahahah GOOD ONE! ha ha ha ha made me laugh

  6. hutchrun Says:

    Then there`s the great environmentalist scientist in Oz who has proposed that the parents of all babies being born should be taxed AUS$5,000 as carbon tax. Another idiot who wishes he never was born. Probly wouldn`t have been if the frenchie his father had worn, had not torn.
    This is the nuttiness that these environmentalists have descended into.
    Brocolli should eat less meat, all that cow fart has gone to head of these environmentalists.
    I`m all for research into alternate fuels, but not this blardy kyoto rubbish. The UN has been a failure all round, and is now attempting to recoup its image thru this new `climate change` religion.
    At least the indians have more cow sense coming up with this in about 2 years time:

  7. Scott Thong Says:

    wits0, so unfortnately true…

    It’s one thing to force us to buy local by imposing mega-tariffs on foreign cars…

    It’s another thing that the local cars are pretty lousy with pieces breaking down and falling off everywhere (except for the engines which are based on foreign tech)…

    It’s yet another thing that we citizens have to PAY to keep PROTON afloat as it does badly despite its unfair advantage…

    And yet another thing that despite all this government intervention, Malaysians buying locally-made cars actually spend more of their salary, compared to other countries’ citizens buying cars with their own salary…

    And it’s a total mess when PERODUA, which has been consistently kicking PROTON’s butt in car sales is denied its deserved status as the national car company (look at Perodua Kancil and Myvi, versus Proton Savvy which is so low I bump my head leaning back in the rear seat).

  8. Scott Thong Says:

    Hutchrun’s Ozzie socialist totalitarian nut link:

  9. hutchrun Says:

    ‘Global Warming’ as Pathological Science

    Trofimko Lysenko is not a household name; but it should be, because he was the model for all the Politically Correct “science” in the last hundred years. Lysenko was Stalin’s favorite agricultural “scientist,” peddling the myth that crops could be just trained into growing bigger and better. You didn’t have to breed better plants over generations, as farmers have been doing for ages. It was a fantasy of the all-powerful Soviet State. Lysenko sold Stalin on that fraud in plant genetics, and Stalin told Soviet scientists to fall into line — in spite of the fact that nobody really believed it. Hundreds of thousands of peasants starved during Stalin’s famines, in good part because of fraudulent science.
    [ ]
    Freeman Dyson, one of the great physicists alive today, put it plainly enough in his autobiography:

    “…all the fuss about global warming is grossly exaggerated. Here I am opposing the holy brotherhood of climate model experts and the crowd of deluded citizens who believe the numbers predicted by the computer models. … I have studied the climate models and I know what they can do. … They do a very poor job of describing the clouds, the dust, the chemistry and the biology of fields and farms and forests. They do not begin to describe the real world that we live in.”

    But what do we get. Leftist delusionists like Martin Khor writing in the Star.

  10. hutchrun Says:

    “According to the New York Post, Hillary Clinton used three private jets in a single day in a campaign swing through South Carolina. And today, she was officially named a Hollywood environmentalist.” –Jay Leno

  11. Global Warming News n Views » Blog Archive » Global Warming Hysteria: Why Atheists, Christians and Malaysiakini Readers Shouldn’t Believe It Says:

    […] clipped from […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: