Sarah Palin Expertly Handles a Heckler, Crowd Goes Wild


Via Michelle Malkin, from Gateway Pundit, this video throws another shovel of soil onto that by now long-buried myth that Palin can’t talk the talk:

“Bless your heart sir, my son is in Iraq fighting for your right to protest.”

This is of course in stark contrast to Barack ‘Teleprompter Addiction’ Uh-Bama, who can’t even string together words into an intelligible sentence when the little letters on the screen stop scrolling.

See also:

PS. Top 83rd post for WordPress 8 Oct 2008:


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

72 Responses to “Sarah Palin Expertly Handles a Heckler, Crowd Goes Wild”

  1. goodtimepolitics Says:

    Sarah Palin can not only talk the talk, she can walk the walk!🙂

  2. A New York cosmetic surgeon insists that Mr Biden had botox injected into his forehead, which failed to crease significantly throughout the debate « Goodtimepolitics Says:

    […] Sarah Palin Expertly Handles a Heckler, Crowd Goes Wild Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Senator Joe Biden was telling Imus he was the greatest thing for AmericaBiden TimeJOE BIDEN PLASTIC SURGERY PICSNYT: Joe Biden Not Your Everyman […]

  3. hutchrun Says:

    Meanwhile, the Black Muslim dissimulates:

    “It’s not only misleading, it was an interview about what the next president was going to have to deal with,” Dayan told The Jerusalem Post, “and to know that they used this interview and took [only] five seconds [of it], and put me in a list of people praising Barack Obama…
    “It wasn’t about the campaign, it was about the political and security issues of the Middle East that the next president should be involved in,” he continued.
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017470356&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

  4. Shirley Says:

    MCcain/Palin voters;
    While Palin/Mccain is asking who is Obama.
    The question the Gop voters should be asking Palin.
    1, Why is she a member of the Alaskin Independence Party?, which is
    link to WASCO. (WWW. AKIP.ORG.LINK.HTML)
    2. Why is trying to distance her self from Ted Steven?
    3. Why is MCcain sat on the board of a very right-wing organization
    the U.S. Council for World Freedom in 1981, when he said it was
    affiliated with the World ANTI-Communist League.
    4. Why is talking about cutting Medicare?
    5. Why is ok to stay in Irap if the Casualities are low?, Jan.2008 his website.

  5. wits0 Says:

    Sarah Palin’s response to the heckler is perfect. It will be remembered!

    McCain believes in his country ; Hussein Obama, his messianic narcism.

  6. Michael Says:

    1, Why is she a member of the Alaskin Independence Party?, which is
    link to WASCO. (WWW. AKIP.ORG.LINK.HTML)
    She is not. That has already been made public by both camps.

    2. Why is trying to distance her self from Ted Steven?

    3. Why is MCcain sat on the board of a very right-wing organization
    the U.S. Council for World Freedom in 1981, when he said it was
    affiliated with the World ANTI-Communist League.

    Being Anti communist is bad?

    4. Why is talking about cutting Medicare?
    Because it is broken and needs to be replaced!

    5. Why is ok to stay in Irap if the Casualities are low?, Jan.2008 his website.
    Because we made this mess and he is going to finish before he leaves.

    Keep drinking that cool- aid Shirley!
    Here is another hint, change the channel once and a while. CBS, NBC and CMBC are in the tank for Obama.

  7. Angie Says:

    Right on Michael.

  8. joanne Says:

    I think Gov. Palin is a comet in the lackluster political sky. She handles the slings and arrows with aplomb, and looks you in the eye at the same time. She is formidable, tells it like it is, and is very much like the Pioneers who made this Country what it is…I like her family….I like how well they seem to handle the despicable name calling, rudeness, slurs & slime that the supposed intelligencia hurl. The funny thing is that Liberals always claim that they take the high road, that they are humanitarians, they are for goodness, light, and …oops, almost said the American Way….but, what I see is a rabid crowd of mindless , yet arrogant, nasty cretins.
    Go Sarah….you are what we all should aspire to be…brilliant, real, hard-working, sensible, and a lover of America, and one who knows where it should be headed….Go Palins….keep the faith….

  9. hutchrun Says:

    “Liberals always claim that they take the high road, that they are humanitarians, they are for goodness, light,…but, what I see is a rabid crowd of mindless , yet arrogant, nasty cretins.”

    And that`s very true. Liberals are a force of self destruction.

  10. hutchrun Says:

    Liberal Two Papers in One!

    “At least one figure on the stage for Thursday night’s vice presidential debate reached a high standard for reason, fairness and class. Gwen Ifill of PBS demonstrated abundant dignity as referee of the much-anticipated debate between Sarah Palin and Joe Biden. The veteran newswoman lived up, in every sense, to her title: moderator.”–news story, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 3

    “These two candidates–aided and abetted by the singularly inarticulate work of moderator Gwen Ifill–combined to produce one of the worst debates in modern American presidential history.”–editorial, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 3

  11. wits0 Says:

    “Liberals are a force of self destruction.” – Hutchrun,

    Because they are delusive and spoilt. They also presume to represent the true America in the eyes of the rest of the world where people can think for themselves.

  12. Top Posts « WordPress.com Says:

    […] Sarah Palin Expertly Handles a Heckler, Crowd Goes Wild Via Michelle Malkin, from Gateway Pundit, this video throws another shovel of soil onto that by now long-buried myth […] […]

  13. Bob Says:

    It’s not immediately clear to me how Palin’s son fighting in Iraq is protecting free speech in the U.S.? Although it is a good put down – who’s going to argue with a mother whose son is in “harm’s way”.

    Palin’s repeated quoting of Obama’s point about U.S. troops in Afghanistan is a distortion. Here’s what he said: “We’ve got to get the job done there and that requires us to have enough troops so that we’re not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there” (from: http://tinyurl.com/5jf9yy).

    It is a fact that at the time more civilians, instead of “insurgents” were being been killed by U.S. troops, which is something the U.S. defense secretary apologised for in September 2007: “I offer all Afghans my sincere condolences and personal regrets for the recent loss of innocent life as a result of coalition airstrikes” (from: http://tinyurl.com/4nqw3d).

    If anything is being criticised by Obama it is the tactics being used in Afghanistan. Obama, to my knowledge, has always praised the efforts of the men and women serving in the U.S. forces. Of course, at a political rally you can pretty much get away with saying anything you like, and no-one’s going to question you. Palin’s performance at her debate last week was far worse – failing to answer questions and obviously repeating memorised speaking points is not impressive, even if what she’s saying hits all the right buttons in her target audience.

  14. Ole Geogi Says:

    Miss Sarah is a gift from God to the Nation. She is serving John McCain well. They both know they naturally complement each other; so whereas I think McCain is the only person who can get America out of the current mess [it sure won’t be easy] after that I am hoping for a Sarah Palin Presidency. It will be a Dream come true! We need the “old Warrior” McCain now, after that I want Miss Sarah! But of course reality comes first: we have to run Obama clean out of public life when he stands for re-election to the Senate in 2010. That man and his lies do not have a place in Amerce.

  15. Seriously Says:

    How can Palin’s son be fighting for the freedom of speech available to the “crazed protester” in America when Iraqis have made no move to restrict that freedom? In other words, troops in Iraq are NOT defending America’s freedom because that country has not launched an offensive against it. Palin’s “best comeback ever” is a complete non sequitur.

  16. Chrispus Says:

    Interview With AKIP Chairman, Lynette Clark on Palin’s Involvement
    http://newsone.blackplanet.com/elections/akip-interview-on-palin/

  17. Scott Thong Says:

    From the link:

    While Obama knew Ayers years after he had reformed and began making an honest contribution to society

    What Ayers thinks of that description, in his own words:

    ”I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.” – 2001

    “Guilty as sin, free as a bird, it’s a great country” – 2001

    “Stomp” – Bill Ayers’ foot, to an American flag, 2001

    “The profound educational reforms under way here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chávez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution… I look forward to seeing how you continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane.” – 2006 (there’s his ‘honest contribution to society’, covert instead of overt radicalization)

    Btw, how many innocent families have the AKIP terrorized and murdered?

  18. Old Tennessee Says:

    Go Miss Sarah! You are on the right track! We support you in the Volunteer State! When things get tough come visit us down here! We are proud of you [Folks in Tennessee are always Proud; that’s another reason for the name of the Volunteer State] and WE LOVE YOU!

  19. FloBama GA Says:

    Joanne and Angie and Michael, all you nice people, thank you from my heart! Miss Sarah is just wonderful; she truly is a treasure, and more than that. It is so obvious that her critics don’t read the News or look at the pictures of the Folks who attend her meetings. The people smile because they are happy. She is truly the revival of the American Dream. She is just one of us. Wonderful! And she can fight too! She is capable of handling Obama on an off day.

  20. data Says:

    “Seriously” is a dandylion idiot not understand what non sequitir means. Sarah is obviously talking about the heckler`s right to say what he wants in the US. Only a dandy lion liberal would be ass brained not to understand that.

  21. fakir Says:

    Poor, the wife can cook, but does not want to! Worse, if you do not know how to cook, but wants!

  22. wits0 Says:

    A dandylion nut will not be able to see facts even when served to them. When you draw ’em a picture of a person, they’ll demand his innards to be depicted as well! It impossible to engage blind denial nuts enamored with MoBama hype. That ebola of hypes!

  23. jingoisticbuthornydesperado Says:

    Whatever propoganda you miraculously conjured up, i have countered it with facts which you have yet to counter rationally or factually correct. And I don’t blame you, since propoganda is not about getting facts right anyway. if you are perfectly factually rational, you would have countered it easily, if you can’t counter, then there is a loophole in your general knowledge. no offense meant, just contructive criticism. by all means, you are not a dandy’s persona non grata just because a dandy disagrees. if you want fascism, then you can worship UMNO or Saddam Hussein. If you want to argue about your belief or your factual accuracies, then be prepared to have an arsenal of facts and reasons to back up your claim as not to look foolishly bamboozled. a building like the Highland Towers Condominium collapse because its foundation is poor.

    Need I remind you that your ‘facts’ on kyoto protocol were completely wrong. I remember you were blaming recession on high oil prices. Now oil price is only $62 a barrel, and yet recession is accelerating. No you are not presenting facts, you are presenting propoganda.

  24. barbie Says:

    damn it’s hillarious to read what the republican supporters wrote here, especially the far fetched ayers connection and obama was a muslim revelations. i am so enlightened by the ‘facts’. thanks for sharing the site jingo🙂

    oh, fighting in iraq for freedom of speech in US? or she was talking about the heckler’s right to say anything he wants in the US? anyway, bringing up iraq and freedom of speech together seems… the smartest thing palin capable of. *chuckles*

  25. Scott Thong Says:

    1) Obama says they worked together – Obama Admitted His Work With Terrorist Bill Ayers

    2) They shared the same office – Obama & Ayers Shared Chicago Office For Years

    3) Ayers says everyone working with him knew about his radical terrorism – Ayers Confirms Obama Knew of His Radical Views

    Refute that, if you can.

    And btw… Obama himself is the one who says he’s Muslim. Not to mention his half-brother and various extremist Muslim groups.

  26. barbie Says:

    Scott, yes they worked together when serving the board, but when Ayers was a domestic terrorist, how old was Obama? Did Obama play any part in helping Ayers with his terror activities?

    Linking Obama and terrorism just because he knew Ayers radical views and working together before is akin to saying those supporting Obama as supporting terrorism, how ridiculous. But wait, that’s what you guys are trying to say right? Funny. This far fetched concoction of ‘fact’ is seriously dumb, for you guys to keep bringing it up.. it reflects badly on Republicans.

    For the last time, show me a more concrete ‘facts’ that Obama was a Muslim. By the way, what’s this anti Islam sentiments you guys are trying to potray here? Republicans and their Islamophobia.. grow up.

  27. wits0 Says:

    Data: “Only a dandy lion liberal would be ass brained not to understand that.”

    That’s why their reponses are usually boilerplate assertive and delusionary denials, too, so encrusted with such expected skews. The detractors are deemed immature and irrational(by them) – like in the unreflective usage of, “islamophobia”. Pushing the blame on to others is the choice indication of their own mature mind?! As if spreading that Wealth of wisdom, via the, “you’re irrational”, assertion implied in its usage. Pretending to be objective without being able to grasp and comprehend facts.

  28. ella-mae Says:

    Ole Geogi Says:
    October 9, 08 at

    Miss Sarah is a gift from God to the Nation. She is serving John McCain well. They both know they naturally complement each other; so whereas I think McCain is the only person who can get America out of the current mess [it sure won’t be easy] after that I am hoping for a Sarah Palin Presidency.

    ————————————————————————————

    No, I don’t think Sarah Palin is a gift from God because the Lord will never speak against His own word. God created men and women differently, men have their roles and women theirs. Women are not meant to lead or teach men (by saying this I don’t mean women are lesser than men. We just have different roles to play). Hailing Palin as this age’s Esther is heresy.

    I believe Palin is a Christian sister but I also believe she is being deceived to think her purpose in this life is to perhaps one day lead the most powerful nation in the world.

  29. wits0 Says:

    Ayers(and wife Dohrn) isn’t the only one, there are Frank Marshall Davis and Saul Alinski. Davis and Alinski are known communists. Also Antoin “Tony” Rezko, the imprisoned slumlord and extortionist. Then there’re Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger.

    BUT we are asked instead to believe that the old aphorism of, “A man is known by the company he keeps,” is completely wrong!

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77189

  30. wits0 Says:

    Dear ella-mae, it’s that cultish Mess-sire One who’s being deceived.😀
    (That audacity of narcissistic snoot replete with a matching wife).

    Sarah Palin is respectable, a natural and speaks coherently.

  31. hutchrun Says:

    Christian sister to ella mae who is also sister to the muslim-christian Buraq Hussein Obama 9who is not “deceived” but carries a monkey hanuman in his pocket?).
    I`ll take Sarah anytime compared to pseudos like this ella (hanuman`s sister also huh?)

  32. wits0 Says:

    What sort of Christian is Hussein MoBama? He cannot tell what is binding from what is not. He misses the fundamental message of Jesus and mocks the Christian scriptures. He and his angry missus belong to a weird and racist Black church with its peculiar Black liberation theology.

    Very telling – He twists the Bible and mocks God :

    http://www.christian-forum.net/index.php?showtopic=22836

  33. ella-mae Says:

    wits0,

    i never believed Obama is a Christian. Never did and never will. not everyone who attends church is Christian. only those who absolutely believe in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ are true believers of the faith.

    Obama denied Christ when he said,

    “So, I’m rooted in the Christian tradition. I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people. That there are values that transcend race or culture, that move us forward, and there’s an obligation for all of us individually as well as collectively to take responsibility to make those values lived.”

    here Obama denies the uniqueness of Christ and the Christian faith while reducing Christianity to being one of the many paths one can take when Christians are to confess one name and one name only (Christ) for their salvation.

    call me an interested bystander for I am neither for Obama or Mccain because Christians are not to depend on the wordly political system for salvation. God’s sovereign hand is upon every circumstance and every situation, whether an evil or a good individual is in leadership.

    frankly, i don’t think it matters if a leader is Christian, Muslim, Atheist, Hindu, black, blue, white or yellow for every believer in Christ Jesus has been called to do the following as written in 1 Timothy 2: 1-4:

    “THEREFORE I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, [and] giving of thanks be made for all men, for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. For this [is] good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,
    who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.”

  34. Scott Thong Says:

    ella, what you quote Obama on is also exactly what his number one fan and public supporter/publicist Oprah says!

    When a Christian woman in the audience asks Oprah, “What about Jesus?,” Oprah insists Jesus “can’t possibly be the only way” to God….

    Watch Youtube

    Download video in wmv format

  35. hutchrun Says:

    Sarah Palin on God:

    GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

    PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

    GIBSON: Exact words.

    PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

    But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

    That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie. And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing.

  36. ella-mae Says:

    i saw that video some years ago, scott. that video is one of the reasons why i stopped watching oprah.

  37. Madame Says:

    Interesting discussion you have going on here, Scott😉

    Is a man defined by his/her religion? Does belonging to a certain religion make one a better leader? Absolutely not!!! What makes one a good leader is his vision, his understanding, his ability to inspire and follow through. Is Obama that man? Well…one doe not know for sure, but the next 4 years will give him ample time to prove himself….he does seem to have the qualities tho. The fact that we are even having this discussion, all the way here in Malaysia is indicative of the fact of how much interest this one man has generated in the US Prez election. Is McCain that man? Definitely not! The man has no health care, economic plan or much of a foreign policy to speak of. If polls are any indicator….America seems to understand this as well.

    Following the campain trail and all its events, you have to admire Obama for the grace aned dignity that he has maintained under pressure. This is true leadership. McCain, on the other hand, probably due to poor advice fm his campaign strategists has come across as mean-spirited, nasty and petty. Qualities more associated with kinder-gartners….not the leader of the free world!😉

    Palin defies description….truly! She undermines everything that the feminist movement has worked so hard to acheive. Her cutesy, folksiness is an insult to own’s intelligence and is down-right patronising! Hmmmm…even senior McCain advisors have labelled her a ‘Diva’ and a ‘Whack job’. I, however, dont agree with the names that she has been called but this name-calling is very indicative of the McCain campaign thus far. Palin’s deep ‘un-curiousity’ is what makes her so dangerous. She speaks without fully understanding the broader picture. Her ‘hockey mom’, ‘joe six-pack’ image is just that….an image…a total illusion with no substance at all. A ‘hockey mom’ who spent USD150K on her wardrobe? A ‘hockey mom’ who spent over USD22K on make-up in the 1st 2 weeks of October alone? A ‘Hockey mom’ who spent USD10K on hair stylists in the 1st 2 weeks of October only? Show me an average ‘hockey mom’ who can afford to spend that kind of money….PUH-LEEEEZE!!!! But then, I guess the glittering packaging is necessary to distract fm her deep un-curiosity!!!!

    I heard that Joe the Plumber has now joined the McCain campaign trail and is busy pontificating on all subjects. He is now even considered a foreign policy expert!😀 Desperate times call for desperate measures, I guess ;p

    Re., Obama’s ‘re-distirbution of wealth’…..what’s all the fuss about? Isnt this what taxes are sposd to do anyways. Wasnt it Teddy Roosevelt who first came up with this scheme? Ronald Reagan also endorsed this during his tenure.

    Re., Bill Ayers… I think Barbie said it very well!🙂 No one is considered guilty by association. Anyway, wasnt it a Republican senator (Reagan’s time) who first put Ayers up for his current posting? So, if one followed your line of reasoning….that senator then should be on America’s most wanted list😉

    One more thing…I rmbr, Jingo very clearly stating that the current economic crisis was first fueled by the housing bubble going bust. You guys, all laughed him off and blamed the economic crisis on the rising oil prices. Jingo, of all of us Dandelions, is one who definitely does the research….and has the facts to back him up.

    Btw, Wits0……Hahahahahahhaha…very amusing analysis on The dandelions😀

  38. Madame Says:

    Hutchrun….all kinds of atrocities are carried out against humanity and is conveniently sanctioned by God??? If ever there was something that could be considered blasphemous….this is it!!!! God does not sanction the killing of another human being….no matter the cause. God is the only one who has the right to give and to take life. There is no such thing as ‘holy/good war’!!!!

    Sarah Palin’s words are more suited the the dark period of the Christian Church, or to be more specific to the Period of the Spanish Inquistion, the Crusades and such. Her attitude has no place in our current world.

    Damn….this discussion seems to be more of a ‘Us, Chrisitians against the rest of the world” kinda thing!😀

  39. barbie Says:

    “Sarah Palin is respectable, a natural and speaks coherently.”

    This just sums up what a boring old man wits0 is. *yawns*

    I am just glad to rebuke you, especially on your so called ‘facts’, and I am been following your responses especially to jingo on your arguments but, facts are hard to come by, from you.

    Keep on repeating the ‘facts” on Obama was a Muslim, please. If that’s not Islamophobia on your part (mind you, this is not the 1st time your comment bending on painting Islam as lesser than your religion kinda comments, I am referring to your other comments, here and there), tell me what kind of message you are trying to project? Please, your so called facts on the ‘terrorist affliations’ and ‘he was a Muslim’ are nothing but far fetched theories, supported only by your Republican friends.

  40. barbie Says:

    “Sarah Palin is respectable, a natural and speaks coherently.”

    This just sums up what a boring old man wits0 is. *yawns*

    I am just glad to rebuke you, especially on your so called ‘facts’, and I am been following your responses especially to jingo on your arguments but, facts are hard to come by, from you.

    Keep on repeating the ‘facts” on Obama was a Muslim, please. If that’s not Islamophobia on your part (mind you, this is not the 1st time your comment bending on painting Islam as lesser than your religion kinda comments, I am referring to your other comments, here and there), tell me what kind of message you are trying to project? Please, your so called facts on the ‘terrorist affliations’ and ‘he was a Muslim’ are nothing but far fetched theories, supported only by your Republican friends.

  41. wits0 Says:

    Dear Ella Mae, so refreshing to see the honesty in your statement : “…frankly, i don’t think it matters if a leader is Christian, Muslim, Atheist, Hindu, black, blue, white or yellow..”

    Essentially this is true but then again, not every religion is the same. If a religion is truly a persuasion and not a political compulsion preaching hegemony and supremacy, what you say holds true indeed. There is one faith in your list above which often fits that oppressive political agenda.

    Madame is not making the distinction between binding doctrines and outdated ones. No sane Christian would emulate the semi barbaric examples of the ancient Jewish tribes in Deuteronomy or Exodus. The advent of Jesus changed all that. No, Madame, it’s fallacious to imagine that all monotheists worships the same “G_d”. Please stop parroting/ implicating the Crusades which were defensive wars. If there had been no jihads, no crusades would have happened. Need I, a non Christian, remind people constantly of this simple but important fact? Also the Christian world underwent a Reformation. Did another?

    Another problem is that a follower of a religion may not even know his/her religion well – in fact, their impression is based on ideals not correlating to reality because of this inherent ignorance. Ignorance and denial goes hand in hand. Since Christians have no equivalent of jihads the “Christians against the rest of the world” thingy is not a threat. Also I know of no equivalent of taqiyah as a promoted doctrine.

    The current days so-called “feminist movement” is a vague and duplicitous animal. One that’s long reduced to the Progressive, Post Modernist thinking suggests that what’s right for one culture is perfectly okay with them too. Example, misogyny and “honor killing”, is okay with some cultures though repulsive to North America. Later the West, ala the UN example, will lose slowly their human rights values with these sort of idiotarian worldview.

  42. barbieboy Says:

    Old aphorism of, “A man is known by the company he keeps,”.

    Ah, wits0, old man with his old aphorism.

    For this wise aphorism, we should conclude that, Mc Cain and Palin by the virtue of running for Republican party are not fit to be future president and vice president of US, for their affliations with George W. Bush – their proud Republican president, the very person and the administration that destroyed the country’s economy through proven disasterous domestic polices and increased risks to its citizens’ life through screwed up foreign policies. Anything that related to Republican is harmful, contagious and beyond help. Case in point – refer to Bush Sr and Jr administrations and how they screwed up the country. Ahaks!

  43. barbieboy Says:

    “Since Christians have no equivalent of jihads the “Christians against the rest of the world” thingy is not a threat.”

    Oh, it is not a threat I am sure, lest your president using God’s name in vain for his war in Iraq. Now, isn’t Palin parroting the same doctrine? Wars in the name of God? Not a threat, I am thoroughly comforted by your assurance.

  44. wits0 Says:

    If things here at Scott hurt so much already, Johan gonna cause an epileptic fit to ya, Barbieboy : http://pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/ 😀

  45. Scott Thong Says:

    Anything that related to Republican is harmful, contagious and beyond help. Case in point – refer to Bush Sr and Jr administrations and how they screwed up the country. Ahaks!

    Oh, it is not a threat I am sure, lest your president using God’s name in vain for his war in Iraq. Now, isn’t Palin parroting the same doctrine? Wars in the name of God? Not a threat, I am thoroughly comforted by your assurance.

    More than Jimmy Carter who presided over a major depression and 444 days of the US Embassy in Iran staff being held hostage – both of which were reversed by Ronald Reagan?

    More than Bill Clinton signing the act and Obama pressing court cases to force banks to make super-high risk loans to the unemployed?

    More than Obama who received more from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than any other Senator save one, despite being only four years in office?

    More than Obama whose advisors include culprits who sat on the board of Fannie and Freddie?

    More than Obama who has vowed to bomb bomb bomb Pakistan?

    More than Obama who overwhelmingly has support from Hamas, Gadhafi, Iran and various Islamic terrorist, American extremist and American communist movements?

    As opposed to GW Bush whose intervention in Iraq has killed more than 23,000 terrorists (who would otherwise be carrying out more Balis, London Undergrounds, Pattanis and Spanish Railways) and made the country safer than during Saddam’s reign – before, during or after Gulf War I? (Half the violent death rate of Obama’s own Chicago!)

    Read the links. Read ’em and weep. I dare you.

  46. Scott Thong Says:

    Please, your so called facts on the ‘terrorist affliations’ and ‘he was a Muslim’ are nothing but far fetched theories, supported only by your Republican friends. – barbie

    —————————-

    You might want to add a certain liberal reporter to that list:

    ”I was a little Jakarta street kid,” he said in a wide-ranging interview in his office (excerpts are on my blog, http://www.nytimes.com/ontheground). He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school, but a president is less likely to stereotype Muslims as fanatics — and more likely to be aware of their nationalism — if he once studied the Koran with them.

    Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as ”one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”

    CITATION FROM NEW YORK TIMES HERE

    ———————–

    And for lols:

    “John McCain knows about my Muslim faith” – Barack Hussein Obama (CITATION HERE)

    ————————–

    For the record, I don’t believe Obama is currently a Muslim, and if he was ever a Muslim as an unknowing child, he was nominal.

    I do, however, seriously believe that Obama palled around with known unrepentant terrorists and thought lightly of their actions. The evidence is compelling, diverse and estensive.

    You have yet to offer even one iota of evidence refuting my claim on the latter.

    Facts, barbie, facts.

  47. wits0 Says:

    “I am thoroughly comforted by your assurance.”

    It’s obviously immeasurably more far fetched to presume that the Kufr would love Dhimmitude.

  48. Scott Thong Says:

    Palin’s deep ‘un-curiousity’ is what makes her so dangerous. She speaks without fully understanding the broader picture. – Madame

    As opposed to Foreign Policy Tzar Obama, who called on Russia to condemn itself before the UN as his solution to the Georgia crisis. Sheer genius.

    Note too that Palin will only be Vice-President, Number 2 Top Dog… But Obama will be the President. With Joe ‘Roosevelt on television during the Depression‘ Biden as his (cough hack splutter!) advisor.

    Her ‘hockey mom’, ‘joe six-pack’ image is just that….an image…a total illusion with no substance at all. A ‘hockey mom’ who spent USD150K on her wardrobe? A ‘hockey mom’ who spent over USD22K on make-up in the 1st 2 weeks of October alone? A ‘Hockey mom’ who spent USD10K on hair stylists in the 1st 2 weeks of October only?

    Oh yes, hockey moms are absolutely forbidden from wearing snazzy threads and being photographed.

    Wives of Presidential candidates, on the other hand, are completely expected to wear thousand-dollar personalized-design dresses and pose for magazine shoots.

    Yessir, much more in touch with the common, ordinary voter here!

    Re., Obama’s ‘re-distirbution of wealth’…..what’s all the fuss about? Isnt this what taxes are sposd to do anyways. Wasnt it Teddy Roosevelt who first came up with this scheme? Ronald Reagan also endorsed this during his tenure.

    Reagan? The man who gave his name to Reaganomics and the Reagan Tax Cut? You have got to be kidding. You have totally closed the lid on the coffin of your factual credibility with this one.

    And as for the reason why some people are afraid of ‘wealth redistribution’… See shortage economy and the economic collapse of the Soviet Union for a history lesson.

    Btw… Obama-Biden are now lowering the definition for the ‘rich’ who will be taxed extra. First $250,000… Then $200,000… Now $150,000….

    How long before even welfare dependents have their food stamps taxed?

    ——————

    Am I the only one who gives factual links instead of just baseless opining around here? C’mon, I’m sure at least ONE of these topics has a relevant Dandelion post to cite ;p

  49. wits0 Says:

    “Ah, wits0, old man with his old aphorism. ” – Barbie

    That’s as old as the Bible if not more. Young, ill-educated dandy punks don’t know.

    “Read the links. Read ‘em and weep. I dare you.” – Scott.

    He can’t comprehend even if he can read ’em. He’ll just call them propaganda with his faddistly inverted mindset because his cocoon of denial can’t bear such revelations.

  50. Madame Says:

    Wits0, I referred to the Spanish Inquistion….dont believe it’s covered in the Bible😉 Was not referring to Deutronomy n other books of the Bible. Read what I said carefully, pls. The Crusades were not…I repeat NOT defensive wars. Perhaps I can recommend some reading material to you on the subject? Let me know….

    Wits0, I did start my comment with a few questions? Like Does belonging to a certain religion make one a better leader? If yes….then which religion specifically? If no…..then this whole discussion about Obama’s religion has been a waste of time on your part.

    As a non-Christian yourself, am I to take it that you are well versed in the history of the Church? Your replies seem to indicate otherwise😉

    Re., the ‘feminist movement’…I am not going to debate the practices of different cultures. It has nothing to do with Sarah Palin, who is an American…the country that gave birth to the feminist movement. Hilary Clinton came so close to winning the Democratic nomination and guess what….she did that without the winking, cutesy, folksy talk n gestures. If Palin actually understood what she was talking about, she would focus on the issues at hand rather than resort to distractory measures. I would have loved to see a woman as President of the US….but someone like Palin….to quote her, I’ll say “Thanks, but no thanks”😀

    Scott, I do understand that Palin is running for VP…but when you have a 72yr old Prez as ur mate….the office of Prez is just a heartbeat away. This was my point! Incase, your gonna say the same for Obama….wait a minute, you wont bcoz we all know that Biden is amply qualified to step in office should anything happen to Obama😉

    I notice that you ignored my last question on the ‘hockey mom’ point. My question was…Can the average ‘hockey mom’ afford this? The key word here is AVERAGE…not elite! Btw, I just watched her speech in Penn State, incase, you hvnt watched it yet…you should. Totally hilarious!😀

    Isnt redistribution of taxes just another name for graduated income tax? Something wrong with that???? Reaganomics did practice this system also…but to a lesser extent. Teddy Roosevelt was the brain-child behind this.

    What about Bill Ayers? I notice that that seems to be the only point that you havent picked on. Still wanna go with the guilty by association theory?

    Another thing I’d like to add…..have any of you guys met God yet and asked him what his name was? Do tell…..I’m dying to know😀

  51. jingoisticbuthornydesperado Says:

    No need to take the dare, the last time i did, the facts were wrong.

    Young ill-educated dandy punks? Wits0, you have failed to rebut me every time, cowing away in this blog to preach your propoganda when you fail to debunk me. I don’t mind if you have different opinion with the right facts, but different opinion based on propoganda is as dangerous as UMNO propoganda. if I am ill-educated why do you have to cow away avoiding my rebuttal? Pick on somebody your own size, wits0.

  52. hutchrun Says:

    “Biden is amply qualified to step in office should anything happen to Obama”

    And that is something that`d be really thrilling (sarcasm intended)

  53. hutchrun Says:

    “I don’t mind if you have different opinion with the right facts, but different opinion based on propoganda is as dangerous as UMNO propoganda.”

    My, my they accuse others of Islamophobia and then indulge in it themselves. Verily non-muslims are worse than animals:

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=CBA566EA-A36C-470D-9DD6-88D752FA5A4B

  54. wits0 Says:

    Nit picking, dear Madame. Do you know the history of jihad?
    Try : http://www.historyofjihad.com/
    You have not mentioned jihad when you speak of crusades – like they were not related. Plethora of plenty from above link.

    The discussion on Obama’s religion is not a waste of time. It reveals his incredible stand and claim and shallowness about it. He is a dubious character who can’t even produce his birth certificate. And why not? What’s the harm?

    “Your replies seem to indicate otherwise”

    Yours seem to be from an obscurantist.

    Biden is as qualified as any Washington gaffe-king Donks.

    God is a Concept, not Anthropomorphic, as such his name is just a convenience in human terms. Name and Form is the nature of phenomenal existence. Why talk about God when one cannot transcends such common limitations of constructs, conceptions and ideas?

  55. wits0 Says:

    Interestingly enough, Jingo, I find your assertive spew the most moronic among the dandies. I can’t find profit in addressing barfs.

  56. hutchrun Says:

    “Isnt redistribution of taxes just another name for graduated income tax?”

    Obama Talks Nonsense on Tax Cuts

    Now we know: 95% of Americans will get a “tax cut” under Barack Obama after all. Those on the receiving end of a check will include the estimated 44% of Americans who will owe no federal income taxes under his plan.

    In most parts of America, getting money back on taxes you haven’t paid sounds a lot like welfare. Ah, say the Obama people, you forget: Even those who pay no income taxes pay payroll taxes for Social Security. Under the Obama plan, they say, these Americans would get an income tax credit up to $500 based on what they are paying into Social Security.

    Just two little questions: If people are going to get a tax refund based on what they pay into Social Security, then we’re not really talking about income tax relief, are we? And if what we’re really talking about is payroll tax relief, doesn’t that mean billions of dollars in lost revenue for a Social Security trust fund that is already badly underfinanced?

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122455061443852529.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

  57. hutchrun Says:

    “…..have any of you guys met God yet and asked him what his name was? Do tell…..I’m dying to know”

    Said he had a few. You dead yet?

  58. jingoisticbuthornydesperado Says:

    is that the best you can do? discredit someone’s fact by saying he is a moron. It is incredulously hilarious how you can’t even rebut a moronic statement. WHo si the bigger moron? the economy has played itself out to discredit you not me. I am not the blundering buffoon. no point prolonging this gobbledegook, have great time!

  59. hutchrun Says:

    Now the dandy lion “madame” wants to push up daisies with Bill Ayers and Obama lovin`. Great stuff, the jihadist and terrorist mix:

    Barack Obama would have you believe that the bombings by the radical domestic terrorists known as The Weather Underground were something that happened “when I was eight years old” and with which he had absolutely no connection. And while it is true that their bombings started when Obama was eight years old, they actually continued until he was twenty years old. And, incredibly, the life of Barack Obama and the terror campaign of the Weather Underground nearly intersected on the evening of September 26, 1981 at an anti-Apartheid protest which turned violent at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York.

    http://www.zombietime.com/obama_and_the_weather_underground/

  60. hutchrun Says:

    “WHo si the bigger moron?”

    Most certainly a dingo jingo.
    And there is nothing finer than a jingo dressed up formally, until someone could find a way of inflating a Bird of Paradise, possibly by using an elastic band and some kind of gas.

  61. Madame Says:

    Wits0….the Crusades did precede the Jihads, right? It was Christian agression twds the Muslims that in part did give rise to the Jihadists….FACT! The Crusades were not a defensive war…it was a war of agression….Damn, the self-proclaimed King of Jerusalem was a Christian😀 You can read up books on The Templars, The Crusades and such.

    I truly dont appreciate labels or name-calling. It demeans the person who utters it and hurts the person who receives it…

    Hutchrun….you mean I’ve gotta die to see God first? Damn….I’d rather not meet your God then😀 Hmmmm….I’ve always believed that God lives in each and every one of us.

    One more thing, Hutchrun….we are trying to have a discussion here like civilised n mature adults….so pls, if its a bit too much for you….run along and play with your little friends, pls😉

    Thanks, guys for the lively discussion…its been extremely enlightening!

    PS. It is the DANDELIONS…not Dandy Lions…atleast get that one correct😉

  62. hutchrun Says:

    “One more thing, Hutchrun….we are trying to have a discussion here like civilised n mature adults..”

    Awww someone`s real hurt, you gou can go pull the other one with bells on. You certinly don`t come across at mature in any sense, just a dandy lion i,e, a puffed up narcissistic progressive liberal blah blah hmmm or just an overgrown spoilt kid. (you still playing with your little friend between your thighs?).

    “….I’d rather not meet your God then”

    hhahaha that`s your lookout doesn`t interest me in the least. But keep looking over your shoulders- allah is following you.

  63. wits0 Says:

    Madame: “It was Christian agression twds the Muslims that in part did give rise to the Jihadists….FACT! ”

    Where did you learn that kind of bias history? 😀 M’sian educational system?

    The Seljuk Turks and their extreme jihad(s) started it when in 1065 they slaughtered 3,000 Christians and mistreated the survivors in Jerusalem. The Saracens already controlled tha Holy Land by conquests hundreds of years before but these new comer Seljuks jihadists now even forbade Christian pilgrimage there.

  64. kesava Says:

    “It was Christian agression twds the Muslims that in part did give rise to the Jihadists….FACT! ” ………..Madame

    This Madame must have learnt that in a bordello. Tut tut she has not read the muslim holy book. That`s the trouble, not much you can do in bordello but lie on bed with your legs open.

  65. kesava Says:

    Madame is not a dandy lion but a cow showing her slip making her a cowslip.
    What about that jihad in India huh? This slipping cow wants us to believe now that hindus and buddhists went to attack muslims in Arabia and not the other way round.
    Really stupid cowslip.
    She got plenty moo but no milk. The word jihad is in their holy book – and don`t give me crap about inner battles. Only inner battles would be that cow in the bordello as it slips in her.

  66. Scott Thong Says:

    The Crusades were not…I repeat NOT defensive wars. Perhaps I can recommend some reading material to you on the subject? Let me know…

    Wits0….the Crusades did precede the Jihads, right? It was Christian agression twds the Muslims that in part did give rise to the Jihadists….FACT! The Crusades were not a defensive war…it was a war of agression….Damn, the self-proclaimed King of Jerusalem was a Christian You can read up books on The Templars, The Crusades and such. – madame

    Did the Christian Crusades precede Muslim Jihad? Were the Crusades wars of conquest and brutal domination? Do Dandelions ever quote actual FACTS at all?

    You don’t need to delve into books to find out the answers to those questions (although, madame really ought to start actually reading some scholarly articles instead of just repeating the talking points she finds on message boards). I’ve compiled the history of the Crusades and Jihad right here.

    Christianity vs Islam – Who Started This Whole Mess?

    Oh, wait… I forgot that Dandelions seem to pride themselves on not clicking links. (Internet must be sooooo expensive until cannot spare 1 minute to scan through a page…)

    So I’ve included the timeline below, therefore giving you no excuse for perpetuating your ignorance about what constitutes FACT.

    634 A.D. Muslim invasion of Byzantine Christian EmpireArab Muslims attack, invade and occupy Christian Syria, Armenia, Egypt, North Africa, Asia Minor, Crete and Sicily, and attempt to conquer the Byzantine Christian Empire’s capital Constantinople in Christian Turkey, until 1169 A.D. Many of these remain under Muslim occupation up to this very day.

    634 A.D. Muslim invasion of Palestine Caliphate Muslims attack, invade and occupy Christian Palestine. Jerusalem (which is mentioned 154 times in the Bible but exactly ZERO times in the Quran) falls to the Muslim occupiers in 638 A.D., until retaken by the Christian Crusaders in 1099 A.D.

    650 A.D. Muslim invasion of Khazar – Arab Muslims attack, invade but fail to occupy Jewish and Christian Khazar (Ukraine and Russia), until 737 A.D.

    652 A.D. Muslim invasion of Southern Italy Syrian Arab Muslims attack, invade and occupy Christian Sicily and Italy, until 1091 A.D.

    700 A.D. Muslim invasion of Nubia Arab Muslims attack, invade but fail to occupy Christian Nubia, until 1315 when a Muslim king ascends the throne.

    711 A.D. Muslim invasion of South-west Europe Umayyad Muslims attack, invade and occupy Christian Spain, Portugal, Andora and Gibraltar, and try to invade France but are soundly trashed in the Battle of Tours, until 975 A.D.

    846 A.D. Mulsim Saracen sacking of Rome Saracen Muslims attack, invade and pillage Rome, the very capital of the Christian church at that time. The unholy, sacrilegeous, disrespectful defilers rob the sacred relics of the Basilica of Saint Peter and Basilica of Saint Paul, but fail to breach the walls of the city. (Kudos to Eric Mudasi for insipiring this addition.)

    1064 A.D. Muslim invasion of West Asia Turkish Muslims attack, invade and occupy Asia Minor and Syria, until 1308. However, later events cause them to remain under Muslim occupation today.

    1095 A.D. The First Crusade First Crusade begins. Campaign is limited to retaking formerly Christian lands. Today, all the territory reclaimed from Muslim occupiers during the Crusades has returned to Muslim occupation – except for Israel, which has been returned to Jewish rule after 2500 years of occupation by various factions, including centuries of Muslim subjugation.

    That’s 461 years of continuous, unprovoked Muslim aggression against Christendom. And you can still claim that ‘Christian aggression gave rise to jihad’?

    Read it right there, links and all, jihadi apologists.

  67. Scott Thong Says:

    Re., the ‘feminist movement’…I am not going to debate the practices of different cultures. It has nothing to do with Sarah Palin, who is an American…the country that gave birth to the feminist movement. Hilary Clinton came so close to winning the Democratic nomination and guess what….she did that without the winking, cutesy, folksy talk n gestures. – madame

    You forget that she resorted to that age old ‘feminist’ tactic of CRYING when she was behind in the nomination race.

    And Obama was chosen as the candidate over her, despite the fact that Hillary had MORE of the popular vote.

    Scott, I do understand that Palin is running for VP…but when you have a 72yr old Prez as ur mate….the office of Prez is just a heartbeat away. This was my point! Incase, your gonna say the same for Obama….wait a minute, you wont bcoz we all know that Biden is amply qualified to step in office should anything happen to Obama

    …….You do know that Biden is only 6 years younger than McCain, right?

    And here you are insinuating that McCain has one foot in the grave, which is a dangerous situation because Palin would be President in his stead…

    While simultaneously espousing almost-as-dead-Biden as a potential President in Obama’s stead.

  68. kesava Says:

    Muslim invasion of India

    Very few know that while the Muslims invaded Persia in 634, they invaded Sindh in India in 638, just a gap of four years. But while Persia succumbed in seventeen years by 651, Muslims took seven hundred years to overrun India (today Sindh is a part of a Muslim country called Pakistan that was carved out of Hindu India in 1947). And even after that they could not rule India in peace. The Hindu resistance was not just fierce, but it kept increasing in ferocity till with the Marathas, the Hindus overtook the Muslims in their ferocity.

    It was this lesson which the Hindus learnt from the Muslims and applied against the Muslims that led to the Hindu (Maratha) victories against the beast-like Muslims. It was the Marathas who presaged President Bush when he said “We will hunt down our enemies” The Marathas literally hunted down the Muslims. So did the Sikhs.

    Although the Arab Muslims attacked India in 638, they were repeatedly defeated by the Rajas of Makara (Makran) and Sindh. The Arab chroniclers then wrote derisive accounts of the reasons for their defeats at the hands of the Hindus by saying that the Hindus practice Voodoo and Black Magic and so bring Jinns and Shaitan to help them in war. So the Arabs could not defeat them, the way they could easily defeat the Persians and the Byzantines.

    And the idiotic dandy lion turned cowslip would have us believe that christians started the jihad. Dandy lions have the Moron god within them.

  69. wits0 Says:

    Dandy lions don’t first gird their loins with the facts before attempting battle. They just do d “all cleansing” ablution from the river of Denial.

  70. kesava Says:

    The History of Jihad site is brought to you by a panel of contributors. This site is co-ordinated by Robin MacArthur with Mahomet Mostapha and Naim al Khoury, New Jersey.

    Other contributors to this site include professors and members of the faculty from the Universities of Stanford and Michigan (Ann Arbor), Kansas State University, Ohio State University, and the London School of Economics. We strongly suggest that this site be recommended as additional reading for students of Islamic History.

    http://www.historyofjihad.org/egypt.html

  71. kesava Says:

    Dandy lions don’t first gird their loins …….wits0

    They have a “moist” Madame leading them – no Joan of Arc this

  72. If you liked that checkout this All 44 US Presidents are linked and compared in this Epic historical doumentary on American Presidential Politics.A great reference tool for the 2012US Presidential election with Obama vs Romney.It will change the way you v Says:

    If you liked that checkout this All 44 US Presidents are linked and compared in this Epic historical doumentary on American Presidential Politics.A great reference tool for the 2012US Presidential election with Obama vs Romney.It will change the way …

    […]Sarah Palin Expertly Handles a Heckler, Crowd Goes Wild « LEADING MALAYSIAN NEOCON[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: