So, believers in global warming… Do you know where your scientific data that shows steadily rising global temperatures really comes from?
NASA researchers responsible for collecting temperature records get their measurements from stations like these below. The temperature sensor is the little white cylinder-box.
Coyote Blog also has the accompanying temperature measurement graph:
The air conditioning vents were installed in – surprise! – 2000. Just when the temperature graph shows a large, sudden surge upwards. Wow, how coincidental??!!
Any moron would know that the temperature sensor record was affected by the hot air being spewed out by the vents, but not climate scientists – their understanding of reality is so superior that they can wish away all the discrepancies in writing their report.
And here’s another example of manmade global warming:
Yup, manmade as in made up by lying men trying to hold on to their fat research grants.
And again, Coyote Blog has the temperature data from NASA to compare:
Coyote puts it bluntly this way:
Do you read the warming since 2000 as man-made global warming due to CO2, or do you read it as a move of the temperature instrument to a totally inappropriate urban site in 2000, contaminated with hot asphalt, car radiators, nearby buildings, air conditioning exhaust, etc?
You should know that NASA’s GISS reads this as man-made global warming, and reports it as such. Further, NASA actually takes the raw data above and in their computer model lowers temperatures in 1900 and 1920, actually increasing the apparent warming trend. For the record, the GISS opposes this kind of photo survey as worthless and argues that their computer algorithms, which correct for urban warming at this site in 1900 but not in 2007, work just fine with no knowledge of the specific site location.
As Coyote says about the above, even kids can realize the sheer stupidity of the experiment parameters which supposedly educated, unbiased and professional NASA global warmist researchers try to cover up:
Out-of-the-mouth-of-babes moment: My son says, “gee, dad, doesn’t that metal building reflect a lot of heat on the thermometer-thing.” You can bet it does. This is so obvious even a 14-year-old can see it, but don’t tell the RealClimate folks who continue to argue that they can adjust the data for station quality without ever seeing the station.
And with a miniscule budget and minimal ground-work effort, the 14-year old and his dad instantly disprove the IPCC by showing that temperature gets cooler linearly by about 0.2-0.3 degrees F per mile from urban centres.
What was that about the urban heat island effect being a totally negligible factor again? IPCC MORONS.
The Coyote Sr. and Jr. little experiment is more unbiased and scientific method adhering than all the IPCC’s cherry picking data and selectively choosing studies.
More examples of global warming brainwashed idiocy can be seen at Ground Based Temperature Recording Stations: Stupid Locations For Measuring Global Warming, such as the below:
Yes, that is a barbeque pit (which involves fire, which is hot, duh) that is used three times a week. Nope, no skewed datan here, so it must be GLOBAL WARMING!!!
Also at here.
This is why I don’t believe the so-called ‘neutral and objective’ climate scientists at NASA and the IPCC. They’re blatantly dishonest, stupid, arrogant, lazy, or a combination of all those.
Do you still wonder why global warming skeptics are outraged that this sort of shoddy research is passed off as ‘scientific consensus about global warming’?
See also NASA rocked by global warming rebellion – Fifty top astronauts, scientists and engineers at NASA have signed a letter asking the agency to cease its global warming buffoonery.