Mathematical Proof: IPCC’s Computer Models Wrongly Programmed, No Climate Crisis

UPDATE: 50,000 physicists of the American Physical Society deny global warming! (Note: Argument going on in the society on what their stance really is.) NASA scientist backs up Monckton, APS members warned not to debate global warming.

Einstein proved his Theory of Relativity with mathematics long before actual experiments were carried out to verify its truth. Similarly, various advanced physics concepts such as black holes, quantum mechanics and string theory are all proved by pure mathematical solving.

Now, despite being stubbornly obtuse to exposure of blatant lies, plain to see mistakes and murder of common sense, global warming hysterians have finally been refuted by that most logical and undebatable of sciences.

Via Moonbattery, from Science & Public Policy Institute:

———————————

WASHINGTON (7-15-08.) — Mathematical proof that there is no “climate crisis” appears today in a major, peer-reviewed paper in Physics and Society, a learned journal of the 10,000-strong American Physical Society, SPPI reports.

Christopher Monckton, who once advised Margaret Thatcher, demonstrates via 30 equations that computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is “climate sensitivity” (temperature increase in response to greenhouse-gas increase), resulting in a 500-2000% overstatement of CO2’s effect on temperature in the IPCC’s latest climate assessment report, published in 2007.

Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered demonstrates that later this century a doubling of the concentration of CO2 compared with pre-industrial levels will increase global mean surface temperature not by the 6 °F predicted by the IPCC but, harmlessly, by little more than 1 °F.

• The IPCC’s 2007 climate summary overstated CO2’s impact on temperature by 500-2000 %

• CO2 enrichment will add little more than 1 °F (0.6 °C) to global mean surface temperature by 2100

• Not one of the three key variables whose product is climate sensitivity can be measured directly

• The IPCC’s values for these key variables are taken from only four published papers, not 2,500

• The IPCC’s values for each of the three variables, and hence for climate sensitivity, are overstated

• “Global warming” halted ten years ago, and surface temperature has been falling for seven years

• Not one of the computer models relied upon by the IPCC predicted so long and rapid a cooling

• The IPCC inserted a table into the scientists’ draft, overstating the effect of ice-melt by 1000%

• It was proved 50 years ago that predicting climate more than two weeks ahead is impossible

• Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth warmed

• In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years

——————————————

Full PDF available by clicking this link.

See this post for an illustration of what climate change psychotic alarmists blame for those tens of thousands of years of temperature fluctuations.

It took long enough – the global warming hoaxers may finally be exposed as the very same un-scientific, paid-off, biased charlatans they’ve always accused us skeptics of being.

But if 32,000 scientists disputing global warming still don’t count as ‘no consensus on global warming’ to the misleading and dishonest IPCC, I wonder if another 10,000 accredited physicists will make any difference against the Infallible Grand Inquisition of Global Warming.

Tags: American Physical Society, climate change, climate change math, global warming, global warming math, IPCC computer model, Physics and Society, Science & Public Policy Institute, SPPI