Yes, you heard me right. I, supposedly the self-proclaimed good and obedient Christian, am (almost) cursing President Obama to his face. Call me an un-Christian hypocrite, but that great is my righteous anger against Obama’s exceeding sin.
Just as the 46% of Americans who voted against him feared, the first thing he does when he becomes President is to throw his full weight behind the detestable act of abortion.
Obama has now signed a bill that uses American taxpayer money to fund abortions WORLDWIDE:
Separately, the administration in the afternoon issued a reversal of a ban on federal funding for non-governmental organizations working outside the U.S. that offer abortions or abortion counseling.
Obama signed the executive order on the 36th anniversary of the landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion in all 50 states.
It’s telling that 58% of those polled oppose this initiative, a higher percentage than the popular vote Obama got in the Presidential Elections:
Fifty-eight percent of Americans said they disagreed with the president’s decision to give overseas funding to family planning organizations that provide abortions…
I’ve said it before… Obama’s rabidly pro-abortion policies kill a higher precentage of BLACK babies than any other race:
This is the President who transcends racism and has redeemed the Blacks??? If he hadn’t been lucky enough not to be one of the black babies making up 56% of all US abortions, he wouldn’t be around to be the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT, TM, today. And this is the gratitude and thankfulness he shows.
He has voted FOUR TIMES to let babies that survive abortions die… These are babies outside their mother’s wombs, the definition of infanticide.
Tell me, Mr. President… Would you prefer to have been aborted by your mother?
This child’s future is a broken home.
He will be abandoned by his father.
His single mother will struggle to raise him.
Despite the hardships he will endure…
This child will become the 1st African American President.
Life. Imagine the potential.
Ironic, isn’t it? As the video suggests, just one casual abortion by Ann Dunham (Mr. President’s mother) could have ended up saving the lives of tens of millions of babies in the next 4 years. I say it might just be worth it just for that alone.
(Oo, you wanna report me for issuing a death threat against the President? My motive is merely to reduce the societal struggle of a family here, and my capability to commit the crime is that time machine over in the corner there.)
Or how about your two daughters? Have you told them lately that they are ‘punishment’ for your mistakes with the current First Lady?
“Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.” – Barack Obama
To President Obama, the fact that already one out of five of all pregnancies end in abortion worldwide isn’t enough (as reported by the Guttmacher Institute – and these are not including unreported/illegal abortions).
Barack Obama is evil, full stop, and I am disgusted that anyone in the world looks up to him.
And so is the Vatican:
ROME: A senior Vatican official on Saturday attacked US President Barack Obama for “arrogance” for overturning a ban on state funding for family-planning groups that carry out or facilitate abortions overseas.
It is “the arrogance of someone who believes they are right, in signing a decree which will open the door to abortion and thus to the destruction of human life,” Archbishop Rino Fisichella was quoted as saying by the Corriere della Sera daily.
Obama signed the executive order cancelling the eight-year-old restrictions on Friday, the third full day of his presidency.
“If this is one of the first acts of President Obama, with all due respect, it seems to me that the path towards disappointment will have been very short,” Fisichella said.
“I do not believe that those who voted for him took into consideration ethical themes, which were astutely left aside during the election debate. The majority of the American population does not take the same position as the president and his team,” he added.
Every one of you in America who voted for Obama, and every one of you who voiced support for him in the rest of the world… The blood of 1.2 million babies every single month is now on Obama’s hands, and it has stained yours as well.
May you beg God’s forgiveness for being a part of this evil-monster-masquerading-as-a-caring-President’s unspeakable sins.
From The Ryskind Sketchbook:
Tags: abortion funding, abortion overseas, abortion worldwide, anti life, baby killer, child murderer, obama abortion, Obama pro-abortion, Obama punished with a baby, punished with a baby
THE SCOTTTCAST 
January 23, 09 at 10:53 am
He’s a modern day Nebuchadnezzar. Who will likely get taken down like his precursor.
January 23, 09 at 12:35 pm
With his slaughtering of babies, I’d say more like King Herod around the time of Jesus’ birth.
January 26, 09 at 10:23 am
My husband read me that letter from the Vatican yesterday – I love the Vatican for taking a stand against Obama.
Let see what Obama is doing so far:
He is releasing evil and dangerous terrorist in the world and helping to fund the slaughtering of innocent babies throughout the world…
Isn’t it a wonderful world with Obama?? God help us.
I’ll keep praying for ‘change.’
January 27, 09 at 2:44 am
The only problem with that Jamie is that Babylon fell when they took down Nebuchadnezzar…
January 28, 09 at 12:46 am
Obama’s 1st Week: 152 Killed….Media Silent
http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/01/27/obamas-1st-week-152-killedmedia-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-156315
Murderer, killer – I`m so angry I wanna throw shoes at him
January 29, 09 at 2:41 pm
what a joke.
abortion is a personal choice.
So if you force people to have babies they don’t want, who’s going to end up taking care of them? You? The state? Don’t make me laugh.
And really, death of a few million more babies isn’t all bad news. The world is creaking with 6 billion inhabitants, it can do without a few million more every year. Reducing the overpopulation is a good 1st step.
You fundie christians are just as funny as the fundie muslims. LOL.
January 29, 09 at 3:52 pm
Buddhists and Hindus are against abortion. Are they fundies too?
I may agree that the world is somewhat overpopulated, especially in areas only capable of promiscuously producing poor quality human stocks and from areas stricken with a dysfunctional Creed. These are the greatest culprits of grievous overpopulation.
January 29, 09 at 4:07 pm
All religious fundies regardless of religion, are funny. Or at least they would be funny if they weren’t imposing their “comedy” on others. Heh.
“especially in areas only capable of promiscuously producing poor quality human stocks”
Ooh, I see, so people from some areas are “destined” to be of “poor quality” aren’t they.
Sig heil, sig heil.
“and from areas stricken with a dysfunctional Creed.”
And these areas would be?
January 29, 09 at 4:55 pm
So there is no such thing as destiny, even of the man made sort? We create our own Reality, individually and en massed over time. Because of political correctness and Progressive nonsense we mustn’t say the obvious lest we be called supremacists? BTW, who are the most supremacist people on this planet? Is that not traceable to their scriptures that tell ’em that they’re the best people on earth??
January 29, 09 at 5:05 pm
i hate the way when people talk about abortion they never focus on anything beyond the act in itself. consider just for a minute why any mother would even consider having an abortion, they might be emotional, financially, or psychologically unprepared to have one. they might not have the resources to bring up the babies to the best of their abilities. so because of people like you who insist on foisting you religion derived convictions on others and they are indeed force to have their babies would it matter that these babies might possibly have poor access to proper nutrition and if outside of the U.S. might have poor access to education and in some parts of the world might even through the fault of their own be HIV positive. but lets ignore that for a moment after all their lives are more valuable than for the fact that they might enter into this life only to spend the entirety of it suffering due to your misguided good-will. Even if they were indeed forced to be born into a family of fairly well-to-do, well congratulations to them then, the lottery of life has been kind to them.
however, consider the fact that there is a pretty good reason why their mothers would even consider aborting them in the first place, and if she decides to abandon the child? what then? the child gets pass on the child services from foster home to foster home, with an increased potential for future psychological problems, too bad their problems can’t be traced directly back to you eh, after all it was their selfish undeserving parents who did this to them, the same selfish parents who were thoughtful and responsible enough to realise for a fact that they were unable to provide the love and support they feel a child should deserve that they are willing to have an abortion but because of people like you are forced to have the child.
i wish more people would consider the long term effects of their choices and decisions. completely unaware that their choices have long term consequences fueled only by a religion derived conviction that abortion is just evil, they never even stop to think for a second that a mother brings up the child, if she doesn’t want the baby, what would that mean for the most vulnerable years of a person’s life. can i then trust the mother to adequately feed, clothe, educate the child?
maybe you have had a good life, you were born into a family which loved you and cared for you. fed you clothed you, taught you what was wrong and what was right, not everybody is capable of doing the same and receiving the same treatment. stop basing your decisions on simply your own life’s experience, the world is infinitely far more complicated than your tiny world is capable of encompassing.
they are some kids in the world whose entire life was but a slow constant torture. hunger, such a constancy that the pain of it has faded into a dull ache, their entire lives, knowing nothing but pain and a slow torture, their life expectancy severely limited because a lack of access to clean water, sanitation, to even most basic necessities. how cruel the work of god eh.
Even if nothing a wrote was true, you are severely misrepresenting facts. The bill does not directly use tax payers money to fund abortions worldwide. it merely gives money to organisations who decide how best to use it. like you know when you give to charity, you sure as hell don’t know what happens to the money so why don’t you NOT give to charity eh. and using this:
” This child’s future is a broken home.
He will be abandoned by his father.
His single mother will struggle to raise him.
Despite the hardships he will endure…
This child will become the 1st African American President.
Life. Imagine the potential.”
seriously? yes life, imagine the potential, so what if that child becomes a sociopath, does that give me broad license to kill all children. just because advertising tugs at your heart-strings, doesn’t mean it’s premise is flawed and brainless.
and stop wielding statistics without providing the necessary background, it is needlessly misleading. like any good statistician, caveats are always added and more importantly, globally this statistics is highly misleading. it compares each and every country through different time-periods, different years, and more importantly not each and every one of this country is directly or indirectly affected by the policies of obama, thats because the vast majority of them have independent democracies and their citizens are capable of thinking for themselves, so to even suggest that we bathe in the blood of 1.2 million babies is highly misleading. not that i care of course, after all i share the same callous treatment to human life as god does. anyway caveats:
“Comments on abortion statistics
Abortion statistics and other data is intended to improve the accessibility of abortion statistics. It is under continuing development. The reader should be aware that abortion statistics are often hard to obtain, and those statistics that are available are frequently inaccurate.
Official abortion statistics are often low due to incomplete reporting. In the United States, for example, not all states mandate such reporting. Even in those states that require or encourage reporting of abortion statistics, this reporting is incomplete (as demonstrated by higher numbers reported to abortion advocacy organizations). From 1988 to 1997, the total number of U.S. abortions reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control was 11.3% lower than the total number reported to the Alan Guttmacher Institute (the research branch of Planned Parenthood). In 1998 four states discontinued state-level gathering of abortion statistics, contributing to the 25.4% drop in CDC figures from 1997 to 1998.
In contrast, other organizations that provide estimates of abortion statistics may be motivated to inflate the numbers. Currently, the Alan Guttmacher Institute is an important source for estimates of both legal and illegal abortions worldwide. AGI is an extension of an organization engaged in intense political lobbying for the completely unrestrained practice of abortion. High abortion rates are in their political (and financial) interests for a number of reasons. For example, high numbers of illegal abortions are an element of their rationalization for legalized abortion.
Thus, when AGI estimates high rates of illegal abortions in the developing world these estimates bear scrutiny. Many such estimates are based on limited surveys. Some such surveys are limited to urban areas, which are not representative of rural areas. Other studies use compound assumptions to develop a figure for illegal abortions from data on hospitalizations for miscarriages.
Few pro-life organizations conduct their own statistical research, but such groups that make estimates of abortion numbers may also be inclined to accept higher figures as worst-case scenarios.
The following pages also include figures on live births and miscarriages. In many developing nations reporting of live births is incomplete. In all countries data on miscarriages is incomplete and is also subject to varying definitions. Reported miscarriages generally include only those pregnancies of a certain minimum gestation, often 20 weeks.
The country listings below contain some or all of the following columns:
* live births;
* abortions–reported generally indicates those reported to government agencies; in some cases figures are available for residents only, for residents having abortions abroad, or for illegal abortions;
* miscarriages–reporting tends to be incomplete and definitions tend to vary (I have used this term to include both stillbirths and spontaneous fetal deaths);
* abortion ratio–number of abortions per 1,000 live births; and
* abortion %–percentage of abortions among pregnancies ending in live birth or abortion (data on miscarriages is not considered here due to incompleteness).
Figures for Czechoslovakia, East Germany, the U.S.S.R., and the Panama Canal Zone end with the last year those countries/territories existed as intact/separate entities. Tables for Soviet successor states include data for the corresponding republics prior to independence; these figures are included in the corresponding U.S.S.R. totals. Data for the Federal Republic of Germany applies to reunited Germany from 1990 onward.
For U.S. states, abortion ratios and percentages are based on abortion figures from different sources with different completeness; the mixed figures are not reliable time series. “
January 29, 09 at 8:18 pm
“So there is no such thing as destiny, even of the man made sort? ”
You create your own destiny.
“We create our own Reality, individually and en massed over time. Because of political correctness and Progressive nonsense we mustn’t say the obvious lest we be called supremacists?”
This sentence doesn’t even mean anything??
“BTW, who are the most supremacist people on this planet? Is that not traceable to their scriptures that tell ‘em that they’re the best people on earth??”
Hm. That would be – all of the monotheistic religions………
January 29, 09 at 11:20 pm
“You create your own destiny.”
Like as if many poor chose to be born into poverty?
“This sentence doesn’t even mean anything??”
That’s because we presume to already know everything.
“Hm. That would be – all of the monotheistic religions………”
That does not create a viable and convincing moral equivalence in the process. Especially to anyone sufficiently well versed enough in all their scriptures.
Referring to others as Gentiles and Goyim isn’t quite as vitriolic as, “sons of apes and monkeys” and this last bit and more is being openly preached incessantly in the Middle East.
January 30, 09 at 9:47 am
“Like as if many poor chose to be born into poverty?”
Being born into poverty is one thing. Staying there is a matter of personal choice.
“That does not create a viable and convincing moral equivalence in the process. Especially to anyone sufficiently well versed enough in all their scriptures.”
Err – actually it does.
“Referring to others as Gentiles and Goyim isn’t quite as vitriolic”
It still is supermacist. And lets not even go to “only believers can marry believers” eh.
“as, “sons of apes and monkeys” and this last bit and more is being openly preached incessantly in the Middle East.”
Whos sons of apes and monkeys?
We all are. Yes, thanks to evolution. Mozzies may choose to deny their heritage, but more fool them. Heh heh.
January 30, 09 at 4:02 pm
“Being born into poverty is one thing. Staying there is a matter of personal choice.”
Some made it out but how many? Besides sheer effort there is need for opportunities. You’re subtly still insinuating that ppl choose to be poor or are somewhat lazy.
“A matter of personal choice.”, resembles a blithe remark, for obvious reason.
“It still is supermacist. And lets not even go to “only believers can marry believers” eh.”
Not all such ideologies are equal in harmfulness. It depends on whether they are still being actively followed, i.e., current and binding, or generally treated as no longer binding or relevant by the masses.
“only believers can marry believers”, is a tribal thing ; there are worse everyday tribal overhangs than that involving marriage.
You can choose to believe in being descended from apes and monkeys but that clearly not “we”.
January 31, 09 at 2:39 am
“Some made it out but how many? Besides sheer effort there is need for opportunities. You’re subtly still insinuating that ppl choose to be poor or are somewhat lazy.”
Was I “subtly insinuating”?
I apologize for that.
I meant to say it LOUD AND CLEAR.
Yep – people choose to be lazy – and thus, poor and/or ignorant and stupid. Read my lips. Choice. Its evolutions greatest gift to mankind. Ask Calvin Coolidge. Anything is possible via persistence.
““A matter of personal choice.”, resembles a blithe remark, for obvious reason. ”
I beg to differ.
“Not all such ideologies are equal in harmfulness. It depends on whether they are still being actively followed, i.e., current and binding, or generally treated as no longer binding or relevant by the masses. ”
They are.
Perhaps not by a vast majority – but by enough to make a difference.
After all, not too many believe in Hitler’s mein kampf diatribes, or white supremacist teachings, but that hardly means they are harmless.
“You can choose to believe in being descended from apes and monkeys but that clearly not “we”.”
Another one in denial? 😉
January 31, 09 at 11:27 am
PITHECANTHROPUS ERECTUS happens to be a myth and made monkeys of some people. http://tinyurl.com/d99qfs
February 1, 09 at 10:16 am
Abortions are only bad if we assume all parents can be trusted to take good care of their kids.
But if we can trust them to take good care of their kids, we could also trust them to NOT abort their children.
So abortions should be legal.
The thing about Obama growing up well. He is rare. And his mom struggled to take good care of him. She wouldnt have aborted him even if it was legal.
The one about the potential of life. Does that mean we should multiply like rabbits?
February 1, 09 at 12:20 pm
ohoh i mean legalising abortions are only bad if all abortions are bad and all abortions are bad only if all kids will be properly taken care of.
February 1, 09 at 2:13 pm
naome, there will never come a day when all kids can be really properly taken care off. Common sense will tell you this is a fact of life.
It is more sensible to say that restraining the human libido and/or taking precautions are more realistic options. The first is especially directed at those dirt poor(yet indulgent) denizens in deep poverty in the subSahara and African regions, say. The second is expected of more advance and wealthier societies. It should be obvious to any sensible person that nothing is so “naturally free” in this world – you need to pay by way of money or responsibility. Failing which, and compounding one mistake with another is not the answer.
No one knows exactly when, at what point in time, that the consciousness enters the fetus. From esoteric tradition it is understood that this varies, some relatively early, others at the last moment before birth. There cannot be a carte blanche for all/most abortions out of convenience although to say that all abortions should be forbidden also necessarily carries its own madness.
Obama has to moral right to make abortion a free-for-all because of vote fishing. It show the lack of moral fibre and wisdom in him. But then, what to expect of a sleazy fakir.
February 1, 09 at 8:29 pm
I think I screwed up in saying that. I was showing that even if everyone took good care of their kids its okay for abortion to be legal. Legalizing something and condoning something are diffrent things.
Like I wouldnt smoke but I like that its legal even if it annoys me that someone smokes in my face.
February 1, 09 at 11:20 pm
Over 56% of abortions come from black women.
Interesting that just like in Katrina, it is Democrat black men and women who do the most harm to themselves squandering money set aside to help their own. They can’t help acting just like slave masters when they are in power. They are prey for Democrats who are apparently glad so many of them will die (see above population control comments).
I think it’s interecting the white Republicans are more concerned about black children than blacks are. Incidentally..Martin Luther King like Lincoln was a Republican. Look it up.
We should spilt the country. Libs on one side, Conservatives on the other.
The libs will die off from AIDS and kill themselves as there economy dies too. Come to think of it that will happen any way.
February 5, 09 at 4:42 pm
If a country and leaders cannot protect life itself that government has no purpose. I am Pro-Choice… as soon as you open your legs wide and say ahhhhh you have made your choice. I’m tired of spineless children making adult choices without morals or ethics. Obama and anyone who follows him are PRIME EVIL.
February 5, 09 at 5:25 pm
Totally agree with your rationale! This is the post for you, Brendon: Abortion is the Con-Choice
February 5, 09 at 7:38 pm
People make mistakes, abortions make them less serious. Could you imagine being born to parents who cannot take care of you or even want you?
Just because you cant ask a baby what it wants doesnt mean it should be born to unsuitable parents.
At 12 weeks old an embryo is as smaller and less smart than a rat. I dont think it would be too cruel to kill it considering the alternative, which is to be born to unsuitable parents.
I also dont think its a waste to kill it, as it hasnt been in the outside world and has no opportunity to develop a personality.
Yes I think abortions are perfectly acceptable. I wouldnt mind if i was the baby.
February 5, 09 at 8:35 pm
Obama didnt condone abortions, he merely voted to legalize them. It doesnt mean we can have sex without the consequences. It means rape victims can have their children aborted.
February 5, 09 at 9:13 pm
Oh to Matkilat- I dont think we have a choice in what we are.
There is a reason for everything we are. And then theres a reason for the reason that caused us to be what we are. And then another reason for that. So you see everything we do is caused by something that is beyond our control.
Like my parents have a big say in my upbringing and who my parents are is beyond my control. So it really isnt my fault if I wasnt made to believe that abortions are bad.
Just like how poor people are more likely to do bad things.
So we really shouldnt judge people. Its all gods fault.
Please dont gimme a religious argument, I will have no way to disagree with you without openly insulting your religion.
February 6, 09 at 9:38 am
naome – you forget staunch Muslims believe that Allah is in control of everything, including how every person turns out. Therefore, we actually don’t have any choice in what we are. 😛
Fatalistic, I know.
February 6, 09 at 9:44 am
Didn’t condone? Then what attitude did he have when he voted four times to withhold medical care for babies who survived abortions? What mindset did he have when he said that a baby is a ‘punishment’? (But then, as I see in your other comment, you view babies as punishment too.)
Do you really think that he does not condone something that he repeatedly votes in favour of and pumps millions of US dollars into?
And yes, the rape victim argument is soooooooo emotionally convincing. If we don’t allow abortions for rape victims, we are heartless SOBs.
But here’s the thing – almost NONE of the abortions being carried out are due to rape, incest or whatnot. The vast, vast majority of the time, it is done simplky for convenience.
Most conservatives don’t want a blanket ban on abortions – what they want is strong restrictions on abortions so that only those with valid reasons can have abortions. (“I was lazy to use contraception cause I know I can get an abortion later” is not a valid reason.)
The reason we are so opposed to Roe v. Wade is that it allowed women to have an abortion if their health was threatened. The loophole that millions of women have been exploiting is that this can be taken to encompass ’emotional health’ as well. This results in the scenario where even feeling upset about being pregnant is an excuse to have an abortion.
Conservatives would change that back to real life-threatening medical conditions. (Being emo is not a life-threatening medical condition.)
Dig deeper into the issues, and you may find that conservatives are not quite the mindless, Bible thumping army of heartless drones that the liberal media makes them out to be.
February 6, 09 at 10:14 am
Scott: “..conservatives are not quite the mindless, Bible thumping army of heartless drones that the liberal media makes them out to be.”
But liberals are those with little principles and motivated largely by just “mores”. All selfish self centered groups clamoring for mores without a clear moral compass…if they still have one.
February 6, 09 at 10:23 am
By extending your reasoning, it would therefore also be permissible to kill toddlers, senile old folk and comatose patients (even if they might recover, say, tomorrow) – based simply on the fact that they are dumber than a rat.
In fact, that’s what real-life liberals are championing today! See these examples:
If Abortion is Legal, So Should Killing 27-day Old Babies Be
If Abortion is Legal, So Should Infanticide and Child Murder Be
READ THEM. It is not conservatives who demonize abortion as inevitably leading to the dehumanization of everyone weaker than yourself. It is liberal abortion supporters themselves whose actions put themselves SOOOOOO FAR BEYOND PARODY. Conservatives don’t even have to lift a finger here!
I’d hate to have you as my doctor if I ever bump my head and black out…
February 6, 09 at 12:56 pm
Conservative Governor Jeb Bush and brother Prez George Bush didn’t do anything to save Terri Shiavo out of respect of the law. That was “some law”! The liberal law and judge won.
The USA could not afford the cost of a feeding tube!
February 6, 09 at 2:11 pm
Scott Thong no i dont view babies as a punishment, thats a dumb generalization. I just think its a sad thing for people who dont want to have a baby to have a baby.
Well yeah if you agree to killing the baby in the first place its perfectly okay to let it die. What just because it came out of the womb its suddenly not okay to kill it?
The reason I wouldnt kill a born baby is because I have feelings for it because I could look at me, and it would cry if I did anything to hurt it and I will not want anyone to hurt it so I would agree to laws which protect the baby from being killed. Such feelings dont extend to a 12 week old embryo. If I have to choose between a 12 week old embryo and a frog, I would kill the embryo. (With the mommies permission, of course.)
I feel that a 3 month old embryo is just part of the mom, so if she decides to abort it, she should be able to do that.
About the comatose patient, if it is known that he will recover then no we shouldnt pull the plug. Hes a human being with memories and all, unlike an embryo. But if he is not expected to recover after some time then yeah, let him die.
The senile old man- yeah just like the born baby, I would want laws to protect him.
So you see if you extended my reasoning properly, I only agree to abortions, not killing born babies and sick people. Oh by the way I think euthanasia should be legal too. I mean common the dudes begging to die! Who are we to stop him.
I dont mind some restrictions on abortions. But these restrictions should be about the baby, like abortions cannot be carried out after a certain period when it is no longer a piece of meat. These restrictions should not be about the mother’s reasons to have an abortion.
Again, no one would skip using contraceptives just because abortions are legal. Really, no one would go abort their kids for fun.
About the conservaties and liberals– huh whatssat? I dont care I just think 3 month embryos are part of the mom and if they want it out, the should be allowed to.
February 6, 09 at 2:43 pm
Allow me to quote you exactly on that topic:
The girl definately did not make a choice to have an abortion over not having sex or using contraceptions. She did not go “ooh its okay I can always abort the baby letter” She made a mistake, and neither she or the baby should be punished by the birth of the unwanted baby. – naome, 2009/02/05 at 8:29pm
I come to the exact opposite conclusion: If it’s not okay to kill a baby outside the womb, why is it okay to kill it inside the womb 5 minutes earlier?
May I cite Haleigh Poutre – nearly beaten to death, hooked to a ventilator in a comatose state, Massachusetts hastily declared her to be in a hopeless vegetative state and wanted to pull the plug on her life. However, she was instead nursed back to health and is now writing her name, brushing her own hair, and feeding herself.
How do you know for sure?
February 11, 09 at 1:52 am
this world truely needs love. thats right, love. put yourself in those little human beings’ shoes and pass the same judgement.
February 11, 09 at 2:47 am
How is something without a brain a baby or a person. Please answer… I’d love to know.
February 11, 09 at 9:11 am
Define ‘brain’.
Do you mean ‘physical brain structure’? If so, the brain of a fetus is already differentiated by week 3. By week 5, it has divided into 5 vesicles. (Technically, it is still an embryo at these stages!)
Or do you mean ‘brain activity’? In that case, are comatose patients also not persons? And if we kill them before they wake up (say, within 9 months time), that’s totally moral? We could always call it ‘abortion of an adult’ to make it more acceptable.
February 27, 09 at 10:11 am
Ahh matkilat. Another pseudo-intellectual. So busy arguing irrelevent points that he doesn’t get that WE ARE KILLING HUMANS! Dumb, dumb, dumb. Enough said.
March 22, 09 at 9:28 pm
legal schmegal
I do not want to pay for abortions…period. But President Barack Obama is forcing me to do JUST THAT via my taxes.
The sooner we can have elections in America, the better for America.
This is turning out to be the worst President (Obama) and the worst Congress (lorded over by Pelosi and Reid) in the history of the United States of America.
Shameful.
Now we REALLY need ‘CHANGE’!!! just SAVE AMerica from our monster leaders presently in power~ God help US~
January 4, 13 at 8:39 am
matkilat,
If you truly believe that population reduction is a good 1st step, why not set the example? Put your money and a .38 where your mouth is.