Archive for the ‘Liberal Values’ Category

That Song About David’s Secret Chord & Hallelujah is NOT Christian

January 3, 21

Caveat emptor and change your playlists.

Honestly, the usage of Biblical imagery and language just feels to me like intentionally mocking Christians. It’s borderline blasphemous, and part of the whole Use God’s Name in Vain During Sex degeneracy.

One version has additional lyrics that go:

There was a time you let me know
What’s really going on below
But now you never show it to me, do you?
And remember when I moved in you
The holy dove was moving too
And every breath we drew was Hallelujah

Rolling Stone says it ‘Brilliantly Mingled Sex, Religion’.

The Wikipedia entry calls it ‘a “baseline” for secular hymns’ while a cover versions of it are described as ‘a hallelujah to the orgasm’ and ‘a “very sexual” composition that discussed relationships’.


That is why re-writes with PROPER Christian lyrics have been made, for example:

Make Your Own Twitter Fact Check Footers

November 13, 20

Font: Arial and select Bolded
Colour: HTML code 2ea9f3
Copy the exclamation mark off me or Twitter.

2020 Election, Possible Cheating & Trump’s Legal Fight

November 9, 20



(1/6) We have 234 pages of sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury alleging election irregularities from just ONE county in Michigan


➡️ EYEWITNESS saw batch of ballots, 60% had SAME signature

➡️ EYEWITNESS saw ballot batch scanned 5 times
(2/6) ➡️ EYEWITNESS saw 50 ballots fed many times into scanner

➡️ EYEWITNESSES say Jan 1, 1900 was recorded in poll book as DOB for many not in book so they could count ballots

➡️ EYEWITNESS saw 35 ballots counted even though not connected to voter record
(3/6) ➡️ EYEWITNESS saw poll workers marking ballot with no mark for candidates

➡️ EYEWITNESSES saw ballots counted with no signature or postmark

➡️ VOTER said deceased son was recorded as voting twice

➡️ EYEWITNESS saw provisional ballots placed in tabulation box
(4/6) ➡️ PASSENGERS dropped off more ballots than people in car

➡️ WITNESS told ballots received after election were being pre-dated, counted

➡️ FAILED software that caused error in Antrim County used in Wayne County

➡️ GOP challengers not readmitted but Dems admitted
(5/6) ➡️ GOP challengers forced to stay away while Dems were not

➡️ GOP challengers physically pushed from counting tables by officials

➡️ GOP challengers subjected to racial harassment

➡️ DEM challengers gave out packet: “Tactics to Distract GOP Challengers”
) ➡️ Election officials covered windows so challengers couldn’t observe counting

➡️ Election officials cheered when GOP challenger ejected

➡️ GOP challenges to suspect ballots ignored

➡️ Challengers barred from observing ballot duplication process


TeamTrump filed lawsuit in Pennsylvania. Key points:

➡️682,479 mail-in allots without review by political parties
➡️Dem-majority counties provided no meaningful access or actual opportunity to review mail-in ballots
➡️Dem-heavy counties violated mandates of Election Code


Statistical Anomalies in Biden Votes, Analyses Indicate

One Twitter user went deeper on the Milwaukee analysis and found that in many city wards, votes counted after 3 a.m. on Nov. 4 went to Biden by a much larger margin than those counted before. Sometimes, the difference was as high as 40 percentage points.

Another internet sleuth noticed that in Pennsylvania, nearly 10,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump’s count at around 9 p.m. on Nov. 4. He said the losses came from three counties: Allegheny (-1,063 votes), Bucks (-2,972 votes), and Chester (-7,135 votes).

Then, around 9 a.m. on Nov. 6, more than 27,000 votes were added to the count, nearly all of them to Biden, he said.

Around 5 a.m. on Nov. 4, data firm Decision Desk HQ updated the vote count for Michigan, adding 138,339 votes to Biden, but zero to Trump. The statistical impossibility of such a scenario prompted people to speculate that votes were illegally injected into the tally.

Within 40 minutes, Decision Desk HQ posted another update that subtracted 110,796 votes from Biden’s total and added 16,638 to Trump’s. It later said a “clerical error” in Shiawassee County caused the distribution of incorrect data and has since been fixed.

Then, at 6:18 a.m., the firm posted another update, which added 158,902 votes to the Biden tally and 29,295 votes to Trump’s. Those votes split roughly 85 percent for Biden—an exceptionally high ratio.


Dilbert Guy reminds you that at least 3 times in the past, he made a prediction that people called crazy and stuck to it and was proven right:

1) Trump would be 2016 President (stuck to it for 18 months)
2) Kamala Harris would be 2020 Dem candidate (even after she dropped out of the primaries)
3) Vegas shooting was not ISIS (even when ISIS took credit for it)

So here he gives his reasoning why Trump has a 60% chance to end up 2020 President.

Statistical Anomalies in Biden Votes, Analyses Indicate
And here’s a thread about the Dominion program and Ballot Run:

>Dominion also had a court case against them in Georgia wherein the presiding judge was very worried about the potential for damage
>Glitch in Michigan swapped some 3k votes from Trump to Biden >Dominion is used in 47 counties in Michigan
>It is also used in 30 different states
>Most importantly it is used in every 2020 election swing state
>It has some Dem lobbyists working for them including Pelosi’s aide >It also violated Benford’s law with Hilary in 2016
>And works in conjunction with the Clinton Foundation on Project DELIAN from the Democracy Project

4. Ballot Run issue

>Essentially most of the found votes turned up with a weird conundrum
>They voted for Biden but did not vote for any congressman, senator, etc. >Essentially they only voted on a single thing per ballot
>Statistically in the past this has happened at a rate of 3%
>This year it ran at a rate of 18+%
>6x higher rate of ballots, but only a “26%” increase in voter turn out – statistical anomaly



And an article detailing what’s going on in each of the contested states, sample:

Start with Pennsylvania.  Biden, as of this writing, is at 290 electoral votes.  Pennsylvania is 20.

I read the Justice Alito opinion, and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason.  Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court, and they know it.  Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules.   A new arrival, Justice Barrett, says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution.  OK, wanna bet she does?

Remove the after 8:00 P.M. ballots, and Biden loses Pennsylvania.  Biden 270.


CORTES: The Statistical Case Against Biden’s Win

Could a candidate as doddering and lazy as Biden really have massively outpaced the vote totals of a politician who boasted rock star appeal?

For example, consider that in key Pennsylvania counties of Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery, Biden bested the Obama election performances by factors of 1.24-1.43 times. For Montgomery County, Obama won this swing county by 59,000 votes in his 2012 re-election.

But in 2020, Biden won Montgomery County by a whopping 131,000 votes, more than twice the prior Obama margin.

Biden’s 2020 total vote in Montgomery is reported at 313,000, crushing Obama’s 233,000 take in 2012 – and population growth does not explain the gains, as the county only grew by 22,000 residents during those eight years.

Such eye-popping outperformance vs.Obama, in just the right places, naturally raises a lot of suspicion.

  1. Biden-Only Ballots

Trump campaign legal counsel Sidney Powell reports that, nationwide, over 450,000 Biden-only ballots were cast, meaning the voter allegedly selected Biden but then neglected down-ballot candidates, including closely-contested Senate and House races.

Again, this phenomenon appears far more prominently in battleground states, raising the alarm for manipulation.

Why would so many people vote Biden–only in battleground Georgia, but not in deeply-red Wyoming, for instance?

In the Peach State, President Trump’s vote total almost exactly tracked the vote totals for the Republican senate candidates, separated by merely 818 votes out of 2.43 million votes Trump earned there. But, Joe Biden saw an astounding surplus of 95,801 votes over the Democratic Senate candidates.



October 12, 20

Many Trump supporters say they back him despite his character flaws, because of the concrete policies he has promised, delivered and promises for the future.

But they are actually operating on the assumption that Trump really is as bad personal-wise as the media paints him to be.

If the public image of Trump is not really that horrible, then he becomes mainly positives with much reduced negatives.

Think about it – most of what you read and hear about Trump being a hatemongering, inept, immoral buffoon comes from the mainstream media. The same media packed with left wing ideologues that tells you every day how wonderful LGBT is, that abortion is a sacred feminist right (while hushing up that 95% of th 100,000 babies killed monthly in the USA alone are for reasons of convenience), that Antifa and BLM violent riots and looting is ‘mostly peaceful’ civil protests, that sexualising children is good actually (eg Netflix’s Cuties).

That same media is where you get your negative view of Trump’s personal character from. You ever think that maaaaybe they are biased with ulterior motives and not entirely honest?

PS. No doubt Trump has a sordid past. But hey, maybe he’s doing good now to make up for his past sins!

Black lives matter VS BLM

September 18, 20

The statement that “black lives matter” should be shouted loudly and clearly, since through much of our history, black Americans have felt that their lives did not matter to white Americans.

As for the BLM movement, it should be exposed for what it is.


September 11, 20

There’s a phenomenon where when a named candidate (say, Trump) is polled against a generic opponent (say, A Democrat Nominee) the unnamed person does better as compared to a poll with an actual named opponent (say, Biden). This is because an unidentified candidate represents the best of his group’s policies, with few of the flaws. But once an actual human is named, warts and all are seen and hence the polled person reverts with less enthusiasm.

My point is, it’s no longer about ‘Trump vs A Hypothetical Excellent Leader Cum Ideal Role Model For Our Children’. It’s ‘Trump vs Biden’.

Biden has no personal advantages over Trump be it in the accusation usual suspects like corruption (decades in DC swamp), pervertedness (molesting sniffer uncle Joe), or age (both are one skip away from the grave).

That leaves policy and accomplishments. Trump wins out on abortion, economy, people trafficking, foreign policy, public order in this age of BLM/Antifa street riots, not being and encouraging flaming hard left hyperliberalism, you name it.

We’re talking real life pragmatism now. If John MacAcrthur or some other Morally Upstanding Christian Influencer decides to run for president this year, then we can start the discussion over ‘Trump vs A Genuine Bible Believer’ again.

NB: This is the gist of Point 4 of why Wayne Grudem supports Trump and how Eric Metaxas starts his argument at 23:35.


September 10, 20

Two men were running for President.

The first was faithful to his wife of four decades, led a clean lifestyle, and was a pure gentleman in speech and deed. While in office, he accomplished nothing of note and gave no pushback while hard left liberals overran social institutions.

The second was potty mouthed, philandering and childish. When he got into office (SOMEHOW), he defunded abortion, got peace deals for the Koreas and Israel, and cracked down hard on child trafficking and people smuggling.

Which of these sons did what the Father… I mean, which of these men gave ‘deliverables’ to the electorate?

(And yes, this is based on The Parable of the Two Sons – with the same moral of ‘Actions speak louder than words’, and ‘It’s not what you say which counts, it’s what you do’.)

See lengthy expansion on that by Wayne Grudem here:

And as William Lane Craig muses:

I think for the most part it’s because Trump supports the policies that they believe in and that therefore they will support him because of the overriding issue of policy matters on which they are in accord. I think that evangelicals really came of age politically as a result of the Carter presidency. When Jimmy Carter ran for president as a Democrat, so many evangelicals were excited because they said, He’s one of us. He’s a Southern Baptist. He teaches a Sunday School class. He talks about being born again. I remember at the time being excited that I could pray for a president now who was my brother in Christ and who was in tune with God and that God would be a work in his life and directing him. So many evangelicals, I think, were very enthusiastic about President Carter and his candidacy because of his evident Christian faith. That led to then a bitter disappointment with Carter when he turned out to be in their view weak and ineffectual. He turned out to be just a one-term president. And instead Ronald Reagan was elected (a divorcee, which at that time was scandalous), not to all signs an evangelical Christian himself, but who at least gave lip service to the causes that evangelicals believed in. I think what evangelicals saw at that time is that it really isn’t important what a person’s personal beliefs are. What matters is what policies do they support and push.

Related aphorism: “Trump was a disgusting sinner, a man who carried out horrendous crimes against God! …And so as Paul of Tarsus. Your point?”

Michelle Williams Boasting About Her Abortion, Memes

May 29, 20



Triple Lesbian Marriage

April 24, 14

Slippery slope? What slippery slope? /sarc

Married lesbian ‘throuple’ expecting first child

Three Massachusetts lesbians got hitched and are now expecting their first child.
Modal Trigger

The nuptials of Doll, Kitten and Brynn Young were held this past August, with all three brides wearing white and traditional wedding veils.

Brynn and Kitten were married 2 ½ years ago in the Bay State, before adding Doll to their household mix.

Mind you, this is the natural progression of things since arguments for gay marriage apply just as well to polygamy.

College Liberal Meme – Fave Picks Pt 4

November 23, 13

Due the large number, the images are split between 4 posts.

#001 – #250 and the intro are here.

#251 – #500 are here.

#501 – #750 are here.

#751 – #900+ are below.


%d bloggers like this: