Malaysian Prof Blames Non-Existant Global Warming For Flowers Losing Smell

Via Moonbattery, from asiaone news (and also in NST 21 March 2010):

Flowers losing scent due to climate change

KUALA LUMPUR: A rose may stop smelling like a rose.

This is the concern of environmentalists as flowers are losing their scent due to climate change and air pollution. And their fragrance may be lost forever.

Science and Technology Professor Emeritus at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dr Abdul Latif Mohamad, said genetically modified flowers might be the way out.

Climate change is also the reason Kuala Lumpur City Hall is increasingly turning to shady trees, because flowers which previously formed the centrepiece of its beautification programme have been wilting fast.

Datuk Bandar Datuk Ahmad Fuad Ismail said City Hall used to spend RM1.5 million ($635,100) a month to plant and maintain flowers in the city, but the contractor’s services were terminated in March last year.

City Hall has taken over the planting, opting for bou-gainvillea and the tropical shrubs, Ixora, for their durability and cheaper cost.

Under the previous arrangement, some of the small flowers cost RM3.50 per seedling.

“It was getting too costly to beautify the city. Flowers were dying fast,” he said, adding that City Hall would continue to plant shady trees more suited for soaking up the increasing pollution and coping with global warming.

Latif said UKM might have offered plausible reasons as to why some pollinators were not spreading flower seeds, a pattern caused by the missing “scent trail” with scent tissues burning easily due to global warming.

“The aroma producing chemical compounds in flowers dry up faster now compared with before.”

The only way out, he said, was to genetically modify the flowers so that the effects would not be permanent and the future generation would not be robbed of nature’s beauty.

“The act is almost like producing essential oils. Scientists add on certain chemicals for stronger scent.”

He said scents in flowers last longer in colder climate as plants can hold on to their essential oils longer.

“The flowers may still have strong scents in colder climate. But locally, we fear this might be lost forever.”

With flowers emitting lesser scent, the insects and butterflies are travelling further and longer to get a share of nectar.

Latif said birds and insects were heading towards hilly areas and deeper into the jungles where the weather is cooler.

He related an incident in Sungai Siput, Perak, where the farmers failed to get fruits from their orchards.

Upon investigation, Latif’s team discovered that the flowers were no longer pollinating after dust from a hill blast blocked the growth of stigmas.

He said Malaysians could no longer rely on nature to heal itself without the help of science.

He said Malaysia needed to follow in the footsteps of Japan, Europe, the United States, China and South Korea which have invested millions in the research of genetically modified seeds.

Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) director-general Datuk Dr Abdul Latif Mahmod said recently the extreme weather change might affect the life span of trees as a result of lighter or heavier rain.

“We should look at how trees can be mutated so that they will not be destroyed.”

He said experts, including from FRIM, should look at ways to prolong the lifespan of certain plants.

Meanwhile, Natural Resources and Environment Deputy Minister Tan Sri Joseph Kurup said given the extreme climate changes, every country should work together and not in isolation.

He said the decline in global biodiversity and ecosystem services urgently called for proactive measures.

“Both policy-makers and researchers need to work hand in hand to strengthen forest genetics, breeding and conservation.”

While I applaud his desire to preserve the beauty and blessings of nature, I feel he needs to keep updated with the latest information – especially in the wake of Climategate and its localized cousins in Darwin, New Zealand, Russia and the USA.

The man at the centre of the original Climategate scandal, Phil Jones, admitted that there has been no statistically significant warming in the past 15 years, even as he was recently forced to step down as the head of the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia.

Scientists at the British Hadley Centre too found no warming from 1999 to 2008. Going back further, a peer reviewed study by three climate researchers published in the Journal of Geophysical Research concluded that none of the warming from 1977 to 1998 was the result of human activity. Instead, the cause was natural variations in the Pacific Ocean that made El Niño conditions more likely.

In fact, data from the University of Alabama in Huntsville found that temperatures actually decreased by 0.39 degrees Celcius from 2001 to 2009. This utter lack of warming might explain why Arctic ice is currently the same as 1979 levels, while Antarctic ice is at the highest levels ever recorded.

Puzzlement has rightly ensued among once-confident climate change scientists, seeing as temperatures have not increased despite continually rising carbon dioxide levels – in contradiction to their theories and allegedly accurate computer models.

So exactly what global warming is Dr Abdul Latif Mohamad blaming for our wilting flowers? It was not so long ago that global warming was even blamed for local problems such the flooding of 2006 and 2007, and smelly mud along Penang’s Gurney Drive. Yep, blame global events out of your direct control for local ineptitude.

I do not blame those whose first impulse is to blame global warming rather than look at local factors. Public perception has been heavily skewed towards climate change alarmism by the powers that be, even as they seek to hush up such major embarrassments as the multiple Climategates, Pachaurigate, Glaciergate (which Pachauri made a bomb off), Mountain Icegate and Amazongate.

I am all for the preservation of the environment and keeping our cities beautiful and liveable. But we really ought base our efforts on sound fact – instead of highly politicized, profiteering-motivated, dishonest junk science – in order to achieve the desired results.

Much, much more on global non-warming at Global Warming Is Unfactual.

12 Responses to “Malaysian Prof Blames Non-Existant Global Warming For Flowers Losing Smell”

  1. Zack T Says:

    Amen! Preach it! hahaha.

    but yes, they should really rethink their ‘jumping-to-conclusions’….
    Local problems, blame on a global issue…
    They probably forgotten how the UK just had their worst winter season ever some months back…
    Even Australia I know had their winter linger for a long while before spring came…
    Global warming causing more cold weathers? Uhh… obviously not!

    Funny that pollution is not the main focus of the blame in this article… but global warming instead…
    Funny they didn’t consider whether the population of insects in the area of the City Hall are abundant or scarce (I’d assume, being in a location within the city, people would kill insects almost without a second thought, then there’s the problem of pollution also)…

    I find it odd that they didn’t consider that maybe.. just maybe… that after the termination of the ‘contractors’ that the maintenance of the flowers weren’t sufficient enough? Maybe it isn’t the heat, but something more biologically related problems?

    I’m not a gardener, so these are just my conjectures, but they’re more reasonable as compared to just blaming the problems on global warming…
    At least, say it is possibly due to current LOCAL weather, that the flowers/plants are suffering…

  2. Robert Says:

    The broader phenomenon is known as ‘Climate Change’ and ‘global warming’ is just an aspect of it. The Santa Ana winds were warmer and more robust due to the global warming aspect and hence forced greater levels of moisture into the upper atmosphere and assisted by the jet stream to dump record amounts of snow creating lingering blizzard conditions in the mid to northeastern USA last winter. Climatologist are beginning to understand how one will affect the other. Science is a slow, methodical discipline that is often rife with continuous failure until the pieces of the puzzle begin to fall into place steadily and as predicted within theory.
    But you will have your ‘blamers’ so to speak, out there who may find cause in all aspects of diversity, left or right or just plain nutty.

  3. Scott Thong Says:

    Or if the puzzle pieces form a picture that outright contradict the theory, the scientific hypothesis will be considered disproven and chucked out.

    Right? Right?

    Billions in funding, countless research jobs and huge amounts of academic prestige that stand to disappear in a puff of CO2 notwithstanding. Right?

  4. Zack T Says:

    Global Warming?? Artic Sea Ice at its highest in 8 years!

  5. Ron Says:

    Here’s my theory:

    Say you’re a lepidopterist (who coincidentally likes taking long hikes away from the hustle and bustle of crowded cities) trying to get funding for a study on the mating habits of butterflies. Problem is, the departmental budget is tight, and there’s just not enough money available to fund your expedition. But then you discover there’s an organization which grants funding for climate research. Eureka!! You submit a proposal to study the effects of climate change on the mating habits of butterflies, and suddenly your project is given the go-ahead.

  6. imam Says:

    Hi, colleague! I like your blog, it’s so interesting! I think it’s pretty popular, isn’t it?

  7. Scott Thong Says:

    Sheer genius indeed!

    The next step is to submit a proposal for a project that you can run from your living room.

  8. Cosmic Condor Says:

    Another stupid eggheaded knownothing comming up with more stupid therories

  9. hooter Says:

    10:10 had a sudden flash of perspective, and took the film off youtube. Here is their statement:


    Today we put up a mini-movie about 10:10 and climate change called ‘No Pressure’.

    With climate change becoming increasingly threatening, and decreasingly talked about in the media, we wanted to find a way to bring this critical issue back into the headlines whilst making people laugh. We were therefore delighted when Britain’s leading comedy writer, Richard Curtis – writer of Blackadder, Four Weddings, Notting Hill and many others – agreed to write a short film for the 10:10 campaign. Many people found the resulting film extremely funny, but unfortunately some didn’t and we sincerely apologise to anybody we have offended.

    As a result of these concerns we’ve taken it off our website. We won’t be making any attempt to censor or remove other versions currently in circulation on the internet.

    We’d like to thank the 50+ film professionals and 40+ actors and extras and who gave their time and equipment to the film for free. We greatly value your contributions and the tremendous enthusiasm and professionalism you brought to the project.

    At 10:10 we’re all about trying new and creative ways of getting people to take action on climate change. Unfortunately in this instance we missed the mark. Oh well, we live and learn.

    Onwards and upwards,

    Franny, Lizzie, Eugenie and the whole 10:10 team

  10. hooter Says:

  11. Simon Thong Says:

    What’s the problem, cosmic condor? who are you jumping on?

  12. Scott Thong, Leading Malaysian Neocon | weehingthong Says:

    […] Malaysian Prof Blames Non-Existant Global Warming For Flowers Losing Smell […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: