…While Alvivi remain in jail for a photo of food.
This attack rottweiler will never be hauled up because he serves his masters in many insidious purposes… To rev up his Malay Ultras in SCUMNO, to gain a psycho-warfare advantage by intimidating Christians (and further emboldening his Ultras to go for worse if no one protests), and of course to distract from the leadership’s mishandling of the real problems at hand which are dragging everyone in the country down.
He’s already dared Christians to respond to his jihad threat.
Now he mocks Christians as not knowing the name of our own God, and calling for the Bible to be banned.
From Free Malaysia Today:
‘Teach Christians a lesson, ban al-Kitab’
SHAH ALAM: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak should ban the Malay bible the al-Kitab from Malaysia in retaliation for the Christian community’s “ingratitude”, right-wing Malay group Perkasa urged last night.
“We have been compromising, we have given them leeway. They wanted the Malay Bible, we allowed them to have it… they were still not satisfied,” said its chief Ibrahim Ali said at the Perkasa Selangor Conference 2013 here.
“It is better that we urge the government and the prime minister to rescind its decision to allow Malay bibles in Malaysia!,” he said to loud applause and roars of approval from the audience of about 500 of its members.
…
“How long are we going to compromise, to give in? We have been trodden on, spat on but we would have been fine with that if they were grateful for our compromises. But they aren’t!” said Ibrahim.
‘Christianity a religion without a name of God’
Clearly in his element, Ibrahim resorted to name-calling, declaring DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng a “pig” for declaring that he would continue to fight for Christians’ right to use the word ‘Allah’.
He also took a swipe at Christianity, saying that it was “a religion without a name of God.”
“Christianity is not a new religion – it has been around for hundreds of years. But apparently even up to today, it has no name for its God,” he said, to loud laughter from the audience.
“They insist on using the word ‘Allah’ because there is no other name for their God,” he mocked, adding that the actions of Christian leaders, pastors and the archbishop “puzzled” him.
The issue of whether or not Christians are justified in using ‘Allah’ is covered extensively: including from the aspects of who used the word first, what the word means, and the fact that the Arabic word ‘Allah’ comes from the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’ (see the similarities?), which is translated to the English ‘God’.
Even what the Quran itself says can be brought into the debate:
Yusuf Ali: And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, except with means better (than mere disputation), unless it be with those of them who inflict wrong (and injury): but say, “We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one; and it is to Him we bow (in Islam).”
Notice the projection above though – he feels his side is the one that has been compromising, giving leeway, giving in, been trodden and spat upon… While it is Christians who have been unsatisfied and ungrateful!
Same as his previous jihad nonsense where he projected his paranoic, conspriratorial mindset onto Christians and assumed everyone else is just as treacherous and prone to insidious subversion/violent overthrow of government as himself!
By letting this fool keep spraying his rabid saliva, the SCUMNOputras are sending a message: You serfs had better know who is boss around here.
And as has been warned, allowing this ‘Allah’ ban sets a dangerous precedent that Ibrahim Ali’s baying for an al-Kitab ban Quod Erat Demonstratums… If they can ban a word that Christians have been using long before they started using it, what other words and concepts will they demand exclusive rights to next? Will monotheism or all the prophets become their sole property? (Not hypothetical, as apart from ‘Allah’ they want to ban words like nabi and injil too!)
Just like with geography, where any territory once-conquered, is considered forevermore ‘theirs’.
——————————
PS. See this lame excuse:
AG: Home Minister is correct in ‘Allah’ case
The Attorney General said the Court of Appeal unanimously held that the constitutional protection afforded to the practise of one’s religion was confined to practices which formed an essential and integral part of the religion.
“The court held that the use of the word “Allah” in the Malay version of the Herald to refer to God is not an essential or integral part of the religion of Christianity and therefore does not attract the constitutional guarantee under Article 11 of the Federal Constitution,” he clarified.
If that is the case, then why was Teresa Kok ISA’ed based on the (false and defamatory) reporting by Spewtusan Melayu purporting that she questioned the playing of azan over loudspeakers? Are loudspeakers essential and integral according to the Quran and Hadith?
THE SCOTTTCAST 