LFW states that we can choose from among a range of options, each compatible with our nature (Stratton’s definition).
Let me use this chart from Hunter x Hunter as my illustration (this is what you get when you mix manga + philosophy).


I’ve added a red tick and line at the middle. Say this line represents the level of ‘goodness’ of one’s human nature necessary to freely accept the Gospel. The vertical columns represent the ups and downs of our life existence – our mood can vary from day to day, our nature can change over the years of experiences and cumulative choices.
Now, E and B don’t look like they would ever freely accept the Gospel even on the best of days! Drop them a promotion and big raise and they also win the lottery, their nature still can never reach ‘high’ enough that they would freely accept the Gospel. They just don’t want to.
C usually wouldn’t freely accept the Gospel, but could on a good day or year.
A and D are very likely to freely accept the Gospel, unless their ‘want’ levels are kicked down real low – say by a nonstop series of unfortunate events that make them question the existence of a maximally great being.
Soteriological views as applied onto this model:
Arminianism says that God’s Prevenient Grace shifts EVERYBODY up high enough that they all can touch that red line and accept or reject the Gospel.
Calvinism says that God’s Irresistible Grace only selects SOME PEOPLE, but shifts them so high up that the bottom of their column is above the red line, it is impossible for them to not say yes to the Gospel.
Provisionism says that the red line is drawn too high up, EVERYONE still retains enough of their Imago Dei to freely accept (or reject) the Gospel.
Opinions and sharpening of my iron & analogy are welcome.