Yes, Tyler Vela continues to maintain (even very recently) that Calvinism had nothing to do with his apostasy. And my stance is, okay sure, I take people for their word until clearly proven otherwise.
But from 42:40 to 47:45, listen and decide for yourself whether assuming Calvinism had absolutely no contribution at all to Tyler Vela’s (and Derek MythVision’s) deconversion.
It sounds EXACTLY like the Calvinistic interpretation of the text and view of God’s character that drove Edwin Curley and Megan Phelps to reject all of Christianity. Vela flatly rejects any other views in his long monologue sections. If the only God that the Bible describes is the Calvinistic idea of God, then what they have rejected is the Calvinistic idea of God.
See also: THEY LEFT CALVINISM
Transcript of text follows, with Vela nodding along to most of what MythVision says.
MythVision: I so relate to you Tyler right now this was my issue as well. There’s, I had a problem. I read Romans 9 and Paul’s hypothetical debate partner when he says – after he explains before any of them had done either good or bad, I hate and I love – and then he explains, for the purpose of election. This is why systematically I’m with you. At least Pauline, if we take Paul – Paul and his perception – and make that the whole systematic view of the Bible. Yes, I think that we’re dealing with the kind of what we call Reformed or Calvinistic type of thinking…
Vela: He’s a predestinian.
MythVision: He’s some kind of, yeah and I don’t know all the nuts and bolts, but at the end of the day he’s like “Well how can He, I mean like, how can God find fault?”. And he, pretty much his answer is “Shut up you mortal clay! God the maker can do whatever He wants, He’s Justified to do it.”
MythVision: And I now imagine, in that world, that kind of makes me wonder like, how were parents at this time? Like you’re calling Him Heavenly Father, so like like, you’re describing here. I’m a father of three sons. I-I’ve been married half, over half my life almost. I mean like for a long time, 16 years. And I’m sitting here thinking, I love people that may be reprobates. We love to throw that term around in the Calvinist circles, and does that mean that I love people more than God loves some people?
Vela: Yeah.
MythVision: Which was an issue for me. I was a five-pointer and beyond, not the four pointer Universalist, ‘God’s struggling with his two wills’.
Vela: Right.
MythVision: I thought that was schizophrenic or at least two personalities, like God had a disorder, His His prescriptive will which is what’s known, a ‘Thou shall not’ – but really what happens is what He really wants.
Vela: Yeah.
MythVision: So I-I did not know how to reconcile this issue and I thought Calvinists were crazy trying to do both, because to me it was like: His will is what happens and what gets done. He tells you things but He purposely works you against. He causes you to do things against this person prescriptive. If He, if He hardens your heart – which I saw that as a proactive thing not a ‘He negates His spirit and therefore you start to fall into sin – God actively hardened people’s hearts. I stopped beating around the bush and called the Bible for what it says.
Vela: Yeah. That’s exactly right.
MythVision: I’m getting excited.
Vela: But you see you’re, you’re exactly right and I make… This is why when I did my, when I gave, you know, did part one of my deconversion… I said, you know, well look, because people were like “Oh, well you could just become another type of Christian.” And I’m like, I mean the only other type of Christian I think I could become is maybe a Progressive, but then at that point I don’t know why I even care about the Bible anymore because it’s just a wax nose for Progressives at that point.
Vela: Like if I want to take the Bible seriously right, I think that Reformed Theology and Calvinism is the one that does it as though – the most consistent with with what the text actually says. Because what happens is, you know, you get all these – and this is where I-I, you know, when I was a Calvinist and I was debating non-Calvinists right? I did a lot of those types of debates. Um, but you know, they would, you know, the the Free Will Theodicy and and, well you know, God doesn’t… God allows evil but it doesn’t cause evil.
Vela: And I’m like, I mean that’s that’s garbage, that’s BS. Like here are like, all these passages in the Bible where God – whatever you want to make of it, however you want to try to gymnastic out of it – like God takes causal credit for it. Whatever you think the metaphysics of how He does it or allows it or whatever, He is taking credit for the outcome and the outcome is someone sinning, someone being deluded, someone having a false belief, someone be what whatever it is.
Vela: So like, I like – and I have tons of examples of them – and I would use this as a Calvinist and I would say when, you know, in debating, non-Calvs you’re like, “Oh well, God just, God just allows the Free Will decision, blah blah blah blah blah.” All right, and I’d be like okay, well like first of all your Biblical texts that directly contradict that because He takes causal credit, report it’s by His hand that Pilate and the Jews and Herod crucified Jesus, right but it literally says by His hand it’s by His, by His perizo, by by His His foreordination. By His hand, in the next verse His hand is the thing that heals, His hand is always causally active in any Scripture passage that is used. Right. Uh you know, He deludes people in, in second, in second Thessalonians.
MythVision: He’s not the author of confusion Tyler.
Vela: Yeah and and in second Thessalonians 2 where it says that He sends a deluding spirit, it’s – you follow the causal chain – it’s so that they’ll believe what’s false. Why? So that He can judge them, right. So so he literally says that God make, God intentionally deludes them so that He can judge them. Now again, Calvinists will will bite that bullet, they’ll go hardline, it’s fine, it takes the text seriously right. So so I look at these other these other views, the Open Theist views and other ones that I’m like – I just, if I’m gonna take the Bible seriously, that’s just not an op, that’s just not a live option for me.
MythVision: And and mind you, when you’re saying this for the people who are just tuning in, when he says “Take the Bible seriously” this is some – if we’re systematically trying to rectify and make it a unity, meaning the whole Biblical corpus, then overall that position makes most sense.