Found at Moonbattery, here’s a great, witty comic poking fun at the Obamas and their trusty lapdog, Media.
From iOwntheWorld:
You want references? See this post for 155 or so of them.
But but but… He does have a publicly released, fully viewable birth certificate! It’s right here:
From Scott Wieser via Big Head Press:
So would the knowledge that any number of civilians might be carrying concealed guns and be trained to shoot deter potential attackers?
John R. Lott at FOX Forum seems to think so:
————————-
The Life-and-Death Cost of Gun Control
Banning guns is in the news. India practically bans guns, but that didn’t stop the horrific Muslim terrorist attacks this last week.
Given that the terrorists smuggled their machine guns in with them, would anyone argue that India’s extremely strict gun licensing and artificially high prices for guns helped prevent the terrorist attacks? In fact, the reverse is more likely the case.
In India, victims watched as armed police cowered and didn’t fire back at the terrorists. A photographer at the scene described his frustration: “There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything. At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, ‘Shoot them, they’re sitting ducks!’ but they just didn’t shoot back.”
Meanwhile, according to the hotel company’s chairman, P.R.S. Oberoi, security at “the hotel had metal detectors, but none of its security personnel carried weapons because of the difficulties in obtaining gun permits from the Indian government.”
India has extremely strict gun control laws, but who did it succeed in disarming?
The terrorist attack showed how difficult it is to disarm serious terrorists. Strict licensing rules meant that it was the victims who obeyed the regulations, not the terrorists.
The attack also illustrates what Israelis learned decades ago. — Putting more soldiers or police on the street didn’t stop terrorist’s machine gun attacks. Terrorists would either wait for the armed soldiers or police to leave the area or kill them first. Likewise, in India, the Muslim terrorists’ first targets were those in uniform (whether police or security guards).
Terrorists only stopped using machine guns to attack Israelis once citizens were allowed to carry concealed handguns. In large public gatherings, a significant number of citizens will be able to shoot at terrorists during an attack — and the terrorists don’t know who has them.
With mass shootings becoming more difficult, terrorists were forced to switch to a less effective strategy: bombs. Bombings are more difficult for armed citizens to stop because they can’t respond after the bomb blows up.
Still, even though handguns can only kill would-be bombers before they set off their bombs, during waves of terror attacks, Israel’s national police chief will call on all citizens who are allowed to carry guns to make sure they carry their firearms at all times, and Israelis have many examples where citizens with concealed handguns have saved lives.
——————————-
Indian businesses are demanding gun rights:
Bangalore: The war on Mumbai has left the India Inc angry and vulnerable sectors want much more than a constable with a lathi.
“We’re losing faith in the political leadership of this country. There’s no doubt about that,” T V Mohandas Pai, director (HR), Infosys, adding, “To take care of the political class, they have Z-plus security. They have arms. What about us? Isn’t our life important? We’re citizens. The government is unable to protect us, then amend the law. Let us bear arms, we’ll protect ourselves to whatever extent we can”.
A worried Bangalore Inc said they’d rather have machine guns than be sitting ducks to a torrent of bullets.
While government installations have forces who can combat an emergency, the private sector has to make do with metal detectors, frisking and CCTV security.
The latest addition are sniffer dogs, which some organizations have opted for, but nothing that can combat an AK-47.
“We’ll not be in a position to answer these kinds of AK-47s and grenades. We need much stronger help from the government. And we’ll need military intervention. May be we could start some military patrolling at least, then there can be confidence that help can come at short notice,” chairman and MD, Biocon, Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw.
——————————-
See also my post on the Mumbai massacres and the morons who defend or close their eyes to the perpetrators.
See also earlier posts on gun ownership and gun control:
For the record, I was anti-guns until around the time that I learnt – up close and personal – more about what a selfish, apathetic and evil world it is out there.
Here’s hoping, terrorist scumbags!
Yep, that Bill Ayers on the far left of the poster, a criminal wanted by the FBI for plotting the murder of innocent civilians (although he denies it like a lying b*st*rd). And his family would be wife Bernadine Dohrn, on the far right side.
Now that it’s AFTER the Election and Obama is safely President Elect, unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers finally sees fit to admit what right wing blogs have been trying to get through the thick skulls of the liberal-loving media and duped public all along – Obama is Bill Ayers’ family friend.
Via Hot Air, from Chicago Sun Times:
In a new afterword to his 2001 book, Bill Ayers, former leader of the 1960s radical group Weather Underground, describes President-elect Barack Obama as a “family friend” and denies he wished his group had set off more bombs in the 1960s.
“We had served together on the board of a foundation, knew one another as neighbors and family friends, held an initial fund-raiser at my house, where I’d made a small donation to his earliest political campaign,” he writes.
But right-wing commentators tried to use those connections to smear Obama, he says.
The Weather Underground claimed responsibility for about a dozen bombings in the late 1960s, with targets including the Pentagon and Capitol. The group¹s casualties included three of its own members killed while making a bomb in New York City in 1970. In 1981, two police officers and a security guard were killed when other members of the group committed an armed robbery.
And via Gateway Pundit, from the newspaper Chicago Tribune:
In a new afterword to his memoir, 1960s radical William Ayers describes himself as a “family friend” of President-elect Barack Obama and writes that the campaign controversy over their relationship was an effort by Obama’s political enemies to “deepen a dishonest narrative” about the candidate.
During the campaign, Ayers’ friendship with Obama was a favorite subject of conservative bloggers and talk show hosts who insisted the two were closer than the candidate was admitting. Ayers’ new description of the relationship seems to contradict Obama’s statements.
Obama had dismissed Ayers as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” and “somebody who worked on education issues in Chicago that I know.”
The statements from the winning horse’s mouth:
Obama said Ayers is “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” and not someone who has endorsed him or talked to him regularly.
“And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense,” Obama said.
From Obama’s ever-spinning Fight the Smears website:
William Ayers is a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, with whom Barack served on the board of an education-reform organization in the mid-1990’s. According to the Associated Press, they are not close: “No evidence shows they were “pals” or even close when they worked on community boards years ago…”
Here’s what the New York Times reported on the connection: “But the two men do not appear to have been close.”
Two conclusions can be made from Ayers’ surprise admission:
1) Obama knew, closely befriended, associated with, worked with, reviewed the book of, and had his political career launched by a completely unrepentant terrorist… Who tells us that everyone who worked with him knew that he was a radical. (Why is this important? Because it shows that Obama tolerated, if not approved of, the radical, violent, murderous, lawbreaking, anti-US-government, hate-filled targeting of innocent civilians that Ayers’ Weather Underground carried out.)
and
2) Barack Obama is a shameless and bald-faced liar.
Both of these things should be enough to give pause to anyone who wants to vote this man into the office of leadership of the most powerful nation on Eart…
Oh, wait. TOO LATE. The complicit Obama-slavering media has already accomplished its job by burying this investigation along with every other legitimate-and-with-evidence-but-smeared-as-baseless-rumour criticism of the Obamessiah.
Looks like you’re stuck with this terrorist-approving liar for the next four years. Hope you’re happy, no buyer’s remorse. Unless…
Remember Bill Clinton? Sure, he was a sleazebag who manipulated a woman into giving him illicit sex, sexually harassed another and may even have raped one. But what got him impeached was the fact that he lied about it.
Anyway, more links in this list of hard connections between Obama and Ayers, which Obama continues to deny and the media continues to ignore.
—————————————
IMPORTANT QUESTION FOR OBAMA SUPPORTERS:
Like I’ve been saying all along… With Obama’s unbelievably vast track record of flip-flopping, breaking promises, denying he ever said what was caught on video, and outright lying…
What makes any of you Obamaphiles think he will actually do any of the things he said now that he’s President elect? Be it on the economy, taxes, war, energy, social issues?
In fact, how do you even know what policies and viewpoints Obama has, when he is so prone to fibbing, dishonesty, manipulation, nuanced talk and deception?
See also how Obama kept changing the figure for who gets taxed, from $250,000 to $200,000 to $150,000 to $120,000.
See also more videos and transcripts of his shameless flip-flopping on all promises.
And If you Obamabots aren’t convinced that this amounts to anything at all, just imagine…
What if Sarah Palin were revealed to be the ‘family friend’ of a former Ku Klux Klan leader?
Yeah, no one would make a peep of a protest, I’m so sure.
(Note: Weather Underground killed more people than the KKK did in the past 50 years.)
UPDATE 28 JULY 2010 Insanely popular! She leads the pack by far for Republican nominee 2012:
UPDATE 18 FEB 2010: Wildly popular at Daytona 500!
UPDATE 20 NOV 09: She’s still wildly popular! At her book signing in liberal Detroit, 1500 waited through the freezing cold night to meet her… With perhaps 10,000 in Michigan! 4000 waited in rain at Fort Bragg!
300,000 books sold on first day!
And her favorables back up to 47-42!
Which makes her more popular now than the negative ratings President Obama!
No wonder her appearance on Oprah was the highest rated Oprah show in 2 years, even higher than Obama at his peak popularity!
She raised $45,000 for the Red Cross in one day!
5000 greet her at the University of Ozarks!
UPDATE 24 OCT 09: She’s still wildly popular!
After endorsing Doug Hoffman on her Facebook, he received $116,000 in a single day!
———————————
Various commentors/trolls on my blog have been saying that Sarah Palin was a drag on McCain’s campaign, being much disliked and viewed as ignorant and shallow by Conservative voters.
Yet it seems that the only ones who are saying such things are liberals who support Obama. Exactly what would they know about whether their ideological polar opposites like Palin or not?
Methinks that the ones who really dislike Palin are the same liberals who secretly fretted that this out-of-nowhere populist bombshell might actually outshine and outperform their precious empty-suit Obamessiah!
Whereas for Conservatives who were apathetic about John McCain’s weak-spined centrism and reluctance to go all out against Obama, Palin was a breath of right-wing, fundamentalist Christian, true-blooded Neocon air!
To wit, What liberals dislike = What Conservatives like. Therefore, the very fact that liberal trolls are going around telling everyone how the Right rejected Palin is excellent circumstantial evidence that the exact opposite is true.
Let the record show:
When Godless liberals knoweth not the Lord Jesus Christ, Barack Obama is becometh their New Liberal Messiah…
(Via Ace of Spades HQ, an article detailing the new liberal pseudo-religion of Obama worship.)
———————————–
Most of the following are from Is Barack Obama the Messiah? and Moonbattery. A nice roundup video can be found here.
1) From the Associated Press:
2) From Obama supporters:
Plans are being made to promote a national holiday for Barack Obama, who will become the nation’s 44th president when he takes the oath of office Jan. 20.
“Yes We Can” planning rallies will be at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. every Tuesday at the downtown McDonald’s restaurant, 1100 Kansas Ave., until Jan. 13. The goals are to secure a national holiday in Obama’s honor, to organize celebrations around his inauguration and to celebrate the 200th birthday of President Abraham Lincoln, who was born on Feb. 12 1809.
Plans, however, are suffering from a lack of support… They got kicked out of the McDonalds they always meet at.
3) From the official Obama website:
4) From Time.com:
Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope.
5) From designer Ray Noland:
So Obama is now President-elect… And the American stock exchange crashes in response. But hey, don’t blame me, I didn’t vote for him.
And neither did 46% of America.
And these 46%, over 56 million people, are now warily watching President-elect Obama to see if he will keep all his promises.
His promise to tax the electorate more… Anyone who earns more than $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $120,000 Whatever he d*mn well pleases.
His promise to tax anyone who buys shares more.
His promise to intentionally makes energy costs “skyrocket”.
His promise to bankrupt the coal industry.
His promise to surrender immediately just as victory is in sight.
His promise to give the leaders of rogue nations all the leverage.
His promise to expose 6 year olds to graphic sex.
His promise to kill more babies in the womb or leave them to die once born.
Or were these promises, as usual for the pre-President Obama, just politically expedient lies?
The 46% who were not fooled by your fast talking and the complicity of the liberal media are watching you, President-elect Obama.
…Not of Bush (in the form of a McCain Presidency as some might say).
Four more years of me having a rockin’ time mocking Obama!
Although the Dow isn’t exactly giggling at the antics… 500 point drop at Obama’s win.
Barack Hussein Obama, welcome to at least four years the Bush treatment!
For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president.
(Unless, of course, the new President makes it illegal to criticize him and orders anti-Obama blogs to be shut down.
Jamie says sarcastically: Highly auspicious time for Obama to become 44th President on the 4th. See here for background.
Coverage, related links and cartoons follow below.
——————–
From my favourite and other blogs:
Obama won, but America is still somewhat on the right track of holiness:
Via Michelle Malkin, from CNN’s live tracking:
Arizona Proposition 102:
Ban on Gay Marriage
YESArkansas Initiative 1:
Ban on Gay Couples Adopting Children
YESCalifornia Proposition 8:
Ban on Gay Marriage
YESFlorida Amendment 2:
Ban on Gay Marriage
YESArizona Proposition 202:
Hiring Illegal Immigrants
NONebraska Initiative 424:
End Affirmative Action
YES
The above was apparently largely thanks to Black and Latino voters.
Seven people were arrested Thursday during ongoing protests in Los Angeles and San Francisco against California’s passage of a ban on gay marriage. … Demonstrators marched Wednesday night through West Hollywood, Hollywood and Santa Monica. Several stopped at busy intersections and blocked traffic, prompting police intervention.
An additional group of about 500 protesters gathered near CNN’s Los Angeles bureau, where they were seen banging on the doors and walls.
The demonstrations caused the Los Angeles Police Department to declare a tactical alert — one requiring all available officers, including some from other precincts, to respond.
Television cameras showed one protester jumping on top of a police car at the intersection of Hollywood and Highland avenues.
From Michelle Malkin:
Unhinged losers: Prop. 8 opponents threaten Mormons and Catholics
Decisions by voters in Florida, Arizona and California to join residents of 27 other states with constitutional protections for traditional marriage have prompted threats of violence against Christians and their churches.
“Burn their f—ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers,” wrote “World O Jeff” on the JoeMyGod blogspot today within hours of California officials declaring Proposition 8 had been approved by a margin of 52 percent to 48 percent. Confirmation on voter approval of amendments in Florida and Arizona came earlier.
And Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger approves of the rioting!:
Today, Schwarzenegger urged backers of gay marriage to follow the lesson he learned as a bodybuilder trying to lift weights that were too heavy for him at first. “I learned that you should never ever give up. . . . They should never give up. They should be on it and on it until they get it done.”
And more: Radical Michigan Gay Group Attacks Christian Church Service
From The Jawa Report:
Wow: Gays Attacking Blacks, Hispanics for Moral Stance on Marriage
Exhibit A. Exhibit B (even worse).Wow, I can’t say that male on male sex is gross without being called a hatemonger, and yet these guys are calling African Americans “n*ggers” for supporting traditional marriage.
But all these violent outbursts are to no avail.
Nice roundup of the incidents of harassment in a syndicated article by Michelle Malkin, here. With her syndicated column on the subject here.
———————————–
Sadly, these are likely to turn out badly for the helpless unborn and elderly:
California Proposition 4:
Abortion Limits
NOColorado Amendment 48:
Human Life from Moment of Conception
NOMichigan Proposition 2:
Allow Stem Cell Research
YESSouth Dakota Initiative 11:
Abortion Limits
NOWashington Initiative 1000:
Allow Doctor-Assisted Suicide
YESColorado Amendment 46:
End Affirmative Action
NO
Overall, traditional non-homosexual marriage made big gains.
More updates from Michelle Malkin who has direct links:
California’s gay marriage ban, Prop. 8, is too close to call.
Amendment 46 in Colorado, Ward Connerly’s ballot measure to eliminate racial preferences in government, is also too close to call.
Voters in several states rejected abortion restriction measures.
————————————
See related below:
In his own words, anyone earning $250,000 a year or more.
No, wait… Anyone earning $200,000 a year or more.
No, wait… Anyone earning $150,000 a year or more.
No, wait… Anyone earning $120,000 a year or more.
No, wait…
Still think a President Obama will take money from everyone but you? Still think he will pay for your gas and cover your mortgage using other peoples’ money?
UPDATE: Obama’s tax cut that he promised to give 95% of all Americans? CANCELLED.
And remember his breaking his word on all his other promises, especially ones to do with money. Do you trust him to only tax the ‘rich’?
Heck, he doesn’t even give money to his impoverished illegal alien aunt and mud-hut living half-brother in Kenya.
Nor is he paying his own campaign workers their dues.
And even if you don’t pay taxes currently… Watch for your bills to break your wallet and your jobs to disappear as Obama purposely makes energy costs “skyrocket” and bankrupts the coal industry.
Sure, he’ll keep his word. Only, he’ll redefine ‘rich’ to mean ‘anyone at all who has any amount of money to redistribute’.
Lots and lots of cartoons, links and examples illustrating the worship the mainstream media pours unto Obama at Obamedia Loves Obama… And I Mean Red Hot, Steaming Wet Lurve!!!.
Perfect timing, since the media is definitely going to skew the results of tomorrow’s US Presidential Election whatever the outcome (i.e. Glorious Obama demolishes McCain, or cheating McCain steals the election from Obama).
Some samples:
Cumulative visitors since 8:59 pm, 16th April 2011:
THE SCOTTTCAST 